Boston writer advocating acquiring Jason Heyward in the off season

An attempt to quantify results. Defensive stats are still 100% subjective. They are a good tool that supports whether a player is a good defender or not, but it's laughable to attempt to quantify runs saved.

Based on your expert opinion I'm sure. Not on people who know way the **** more than you. Then again you could have been a baseball star if only not for your coach so we should trust your opinion.
 
An attempt to quantify results. Defensive stats are still 100% subjective. They are a good tool that supports whether a player is a good defender or not, but it's laughable to attempt to quantify runs saved.

This X 1000.
 
Based on your expert opinion I'm sure. Not on people who know way the **** more than you. Then again you could have been a baseball star if only not for your coach so we should trust your opinion.

Coming from some fat unathletic kid that never excelled at anything in his life except eating mustard and finding ways to not work for a living.

How many college level statistics classes have you taken?
 
Based on your expert opinion I'm sure. Not on people who know way the **** more than you. Then again you could have been a baseball star if only not for your coach so we should trust your opinion.

So defensive stats aren't based on subjectivity?
 
Well for someone who doesn't get many opportunities he has some pretty impressive defensive numbers. But I guess that kind of impact is minimal? It's not like we saw Doumit in RF and how big that cost us. It's weird how defense also effects pitching. Another minimal impact too I'm sure.

What makes these defensive numbers accurate? Are they same defensive metrics that say Kung Fu Panda is a better defender than Manny Machado?
 
Not according to fWAR..

Also if you had a clue you'd know it's called rWAR.

And what evidence do you have that he's not worth that much defensively? Key word is evidence. Not your gut feeling cause that ****'s worthless.

So what you're saying is that defensive metrics can't even agree on how valuable Jason's defense is, but we're supposed to take it on some sort of faith that it's good enough to compensate for the massive difference in offensive production?
 
Coming from some fat unathletic kid that never excelled at anything in his life except eating mustard and finding ways to not work for a living.

How many college level statistics classes have you taken?

LMAO this is how I know I won. Cause you're resulting to gradeschool level insults. You have nothing. I love it.
 
So what you're saying is that defensive metrics can't even agree on how valuable Jason's defense is, but we're supposed to take it on some sort of faith that it's good enough to compensate for the massive difference in offensive production?

Both agree he's fantastic defensively. As far as how they come to different numbers, if you knew anything about the stats, you'd understand the differences between the 2. But I won't lecture you. Google can teach you what you need to know.
 
So defensive stats aren't based on subjectivity?

There's a degree of subjectivity. Such as if something is hit hard, soft, medium, if it's a line drive or flyball, etc. But the amount of times that's truly wrong, you're arguing semantics.
 
LMAO this is how I know I won. Cause you're resulting to gradeschool level insults. You have nothing. I love it.

From same page:

"Then again you could have been a baseball star if only not for your coach so we should trust your opinion."

I guess I own you then.

Ahh, I see you admit the stats are subjective. Ok.
 
Every valuation stat is subjective to a degree or another. Hell even batting average is truly subjective to a degree, as an error is subject to someone scoring something as a hit or an error.
 
There's a degree of subjectivity. Such as if something is hit hard, soft, medium, if it's a line drive or flyball, etc. But the amount of times that's truly wrong, you're arguing semantics.

Its much more than semantics.

Much like a great hitter/pitcher are given the benefit of the doubt from umps on borderline pitchers, players with great defensive reputation can be rewarded with a positive rating on close plays. Most defensive metrics do not take into account defensive positioning, which could heavily influence someones rating. Heyward may not even be playing any different than yrs past. It could simply be that many of the RFers in baseball simply have sucked this yr. And past all that, there is no way to know for certain if an average player could have made a play on a particular ball in play, so many defensive stats are making a pretty big assumption on an unknown factor.
 
My fear about Jason leaving is that he goes somewhere and finally fixes his hitting mechanics and becomes the MVP he would then surely be.
 
I know no stat that favors a players rep. Just shows you don't know what's being tracked.

Are you effing serious? The values placed and ratings applied to a particular play are recorded by humans. So there's no human error in that according to you?
 
Are you effing serious? The values placed and ratings applied to a particular play are recorded by humans. So there's no human error in that according to you?

That's not what happens with those stats. Even if you explain it in the simplest fashion.
 
Jason Heyward is really effin valuable. That much can't be disputed. Its all about whether or not you are going to let him walk for just a comp pick. That is something I don't want to do. Do whatever it takes to sign him long term but if he doesn't do it then you absolutely have to trade him. This team is not that close to winning a title.
 
My fear about Jason leaving is that he goes somewhere and finally fixes his hitting mechanics and becomes the MVP he would then surely be.

And that is the biggest concern with trading him if you believe their is a realistic chance of signing him.

And the flipside is paying a guy 20 million a year for sub .800 OPS at a corner spot.
 
That's not what happens with those stats. Even if you explain it in the simplest fashion.

I would bank you don't even know how these stats are calculated, but go ahead and do a quick google search to see how much you can learn in a few minutes.
 
Back
Top