Braves Meeting with Lester

Hanley has a steamer projected WAR of 3.3 next year in 600 PA's. That sounds about right. So at 22 million next season he would be getting paid 6.67 million per WAR. That's a step up from last off season when hitters were getting roughly 6 million per WAR. If anything he's overpaid because as he ages his WAR will likely see some decline as he's now on the wrong side of 30. But as of now he got market value.
 
Primary factors to consider when determining market value: dollars (AAV), years, economic environment, positional ranking on market, etc, etc, etc.
 
Enscheff will love this.

David O'Brien

@DOBrienAJC

For what it's worth, earlier this year Jon Lester bought a house that's very close to site of the new #Braves ballpark.

David O'Brien

@DOBrienAJC

Lester and his wife and kids have lived near Peachtree City in recent years.
 
Primary factors to consider when determining market value: dollars (AAV), years, economic environment, positional ranking on market, etc, etc, etc.

Sure those are factors. The biggest one is production though. If Hanley is projected to be a 3-4 win player then this is pretty much market value.
 
Sure those are factors. The biggest one is production though. If Hanley is projected to be a 3-4 win player then this is pretty much market value.

I'd argue that 'projected' production is actually a very menial component of what determines the financial value of a player in the modern baseball economy.

Ramirez wanted $130MM+ over 5 years last spring. He took $88MM over 4 as the top impact bat available at a position (SS) that several teams with extremely deep pockets desperately need to upgrade. In November.
 
I'd argue that 'projected' production is actually a very menial component of what determines the financial value of a player in the modern baseball economy.

Ramirez wanted $130MM+ over 5 years last spring. He took $88MM over 4 as the top impact bat available at a position (SS) that several teams with extremely deep pockets desperately need to upgrade. In November.

Top impact bat or not players are still paid on production. And yes projected production is very important when handing out contracts to players over the age of 30. He has a history of beiing injured and an inconsistant bat. He is no longer the star SS he was in his mid 20's. He's not that guy. He is who he is right now. A 3-4 win player who is offense first. Those guys get paid what Hanley got paid.
 
Gordon Wittenmyer
@GDubCub
Source: Report that Cubs offered Lester a six-year deal of more than $135m is "not accurate."
 
Top impact bat or not players are still paid on production. And yes projected production is very important when handing out contracts to players over the age of 30. He has a history of beiing injured and an inconsistant bat. He is no longer the star SS he was in his mid 20's. He's not that guy. He is who he is right now. A 3-4 win player who is offense first. Those guys get paid what Hanley got paid.

Demonstrated production is a baseline. Projected production is a consideration (especially for a player over 30 ... because their contributions are going to be extremely unpredictable). This isn't a simulation, there are many other driving elements that come into play here that are well outside of the rigid model you have chosen to adhere to.
 
Gordon Wittenmyer

@GDubCub

Source: Report that Cubs offered Lester a six-year deal of more than $135m is "not accurate."

There sure have been a lot of reports lately that later we hear is "not accurate." Gammons seems to put out a lot of reports these days that turn out to not be not accurate. So much so that anytime he says something I simply wait to see what other sources say before I pass his information along.
 
I mean, it's gotten to the point where I feel bad insulting somebody who must be a child.

I know the feeling, that is why I started ignoring him. Though I understand the temptation because it is annoying as often as he takes posts out of context or simply misreads them, etc.
 
Demonstrated production is a baseline. Projected production is a consideration (especially for a player over 30 ... because their contributions are going to be extremely unpredictable). This isn't a simulation, there are many other driving elements that come into play here that are well outside of the rigid model you have chosen to adhere to.

Right. So past and future production isn't whats used to determine contracts? Makes sense to me.
 
Stick to copying/pasting twitter posts.

22 mil a year isnt below market at all.

Kershaw - 33 per
Verlander - 26 per
Lee - 25 per
Felix - 25 per
Greinke - 25 per
Hamels - 24 per
Lincecum - 23 per
CC - 23 per

Considering Lester is better than all but 2, maybe 3 of those guys, also factoring in what Max is going to get.....I'd say 22 is under market for Lester.
 
Kershaw - 33 per
Verlander - 26 per
Lee - 25 per
Felix - 25 per
Greinke - 25 per
Hamels - 24 per
Lincecum - 23 per
CC - 23 per

Considering Lester is better than all but 2, maybe 3 of those guys, also factoring in what Max is going to get.....I'd say 22 is under market for Lester.

When they got their money, Lester isn't better than any of those guys. $22m is actually about right. I don't really have a cat in this fight, though.
 
There sure have been a lot of reports lately that later we hear is "not accurate." Gammons seems to put out a lot of reports these days that turn out to not be not accurate. So much so that anytime he says something I simply wait to see what other sources say before I pass his information along.

I love Peter Gammons, guy was one of the best of the business, and his credibility as an insider was great during the late 80's and throughout the 90's...but he's past his prime and he's become senile and in his mind everybody is going to the Red Sox.
 
I love Peter Gammons, guy was one of the best of the business, and his credibility as an insider was great during the late 80's and throughout the 90's...but he's past his prime and he's become senile and in his mind everybody is going to the Red Sox.

Looks to me like everybody IS going to the Red Sox. They've got, like, seven outfielders and three third basemen.
 
Looks to me like everybody IS going to the Red Sox. They've got, like, seven outfielders and three third basemen.

Should be a pretty good World Series then, we'll see who wins out...pitching or hitting.

That's right, your 2015 Atlanta Braves consisting of 10 starting pitchers and 15 relievers...and the Boston Red Sox with 25 hitters.
 
Kershaw - 33 per
Verlander - 26 per
Lee - 25 per
Felix - 25 per
Greinke - 25 per
Hamels - 24 per
Lincecum - 23 per
CC - 23 per

Considering Lester is better than all but 2, maybe 3 of those guys, also factoring in what Max is going to get.....I'd say 22 is under market for Lester.

I was talking about Hanley, not Lester.

I know Lester will probably get 23-25+ a year.
 
When they got their money, Lester isn't better than any of those guys. $22m is actually about right. I don't really have a cat in this fight, though.

Couple things....

1- It doesn't matter when they got the contract, those are the highest paid pitchers and that's how deals work.

2- Lester is coming off a 6.1 WAR, were his value was at 33.4 mil with a 2.46 ERA and a xFIP of 3.10

Verlander signed his deal after the 2012 season in which he had a 7 WAR and a value of 31.5 with a 2.64 and a 3.31 xFIP
Lee signed his deal after the 2010 season in which he had a 7 WAR and a value of 29.6 with a 3.18 ERA 3.06 and a xFIP
Feliz signed his deal after the 2011 season in which he had a 4.7 WAR and a value of 21.2 with a 3.47 ERA and a 3.15 xFIP
Greinke signed his deal after the 2012 season in which he had a 4.8 WAR and a value of 21.8 with a 3.48 ERA and a 3.22 xFIP
Hamels signed his deal after the 2011 season in which he had a 4.6 WAR with a value of 20.7 with a 2.79 ERA and a 3.02 xFIP
CC signed his deal after the 2008 season in which he had a 7.2 WAR with a value of 32.4 mil with a 2.7 ERA and a 3.06 xFIP

Point of all that? Lester was better than most of those guys and equal to others, aside from Kershaw.
 
Back
Top