DOGE
- Thread starter acesfull86
- Start date
You should probably read Article II of the Constitution where the President and not the legislature runs the executive branch.
These blue state judges are in for a reality check.
These radical judges understand this - They are just trying to delay as much as possible because the Democrats are in complete disarray and can't keep up with the pace of the Trump admin. THey are use to the president going to bed with pudding at 2PM now.
Last edited by a moderator:
Its funny when their argument is "Who elected Elon/Big Balls" when its literally all unelected bureaucrats that are defrauding the system.
Aren’t you the folks who said Clarence Thomas didn’t need to recuse himself from cases his wife had a professional interest in? I seem to remember agreeing with you guys on Thomas, but how is this so different?
How is this different than Biden’s student loan forgiveness stuff? Biden was the Executive and ran the Department of Education, so who’s to say he can’t just not collect money?
Because having tax-payers footing the bill for loan debt is beyond the scope of the executive branch.
When the Supreme Court struck down blanket loan forgiveness in Biden v. Nebraska, it scolded the executive branch for “seizing the power of the Legislature.”
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, that’s what Trump is doing too when he refuses to pay bills that Congress appropriated. Saying you’re shifting the burden to tax payers is both technically true and false. They’re just not executing the AR side of a loan. I wasn’t provided with an additional “student loan fund” tax.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-orders-hhs-cdc-fda-restore-deleted-webpages-health-information/
This one, on the other hand, feels like judicial overreach. Which sucks because I find this action far more harmful and gross than some of the orders I’ve agreed with the courts on.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
One reason I suspect these people know their arguments are bull**** is they’re calling on Congress to impeach judges now and declaring it’s illegal publicly, but like, a highly conservative SCOTUS is just waiting in the wings. If the judges ruling against Trump are not interpreting the law properly, your hand-picked group of justices will get to weigh in on the merits. Why don’t we just let them do their jobs and not replace the judges before the appeals process takes shape?
This isn’t a ****ing coup, it’s a minor inconvenience for the people wanting to cut services to Americans and fire a bunch of people. My taxes are gonna be the same this month regardless of what happens. Boo ****ing hoo that someone gets fired a couple weeks later than you wanted.
This isn’t a ****ing coup, it’s a minor inconvenience for the people wanting to cut services to Americans and fire a bunch of people. My taxes are gonna be the same this month regardless of what happens. Boo ****ing hoo that someone gets fired a couple weeks later than you wanted.
Last edited by a moderator: