People assume he's gonna sit mid 90s+ and I think that's a mistake. Guys dont consistently work at the top of their ranges.
A pitcher with a fastball sitting 91-93, an above average curve and change, and good command is a good pitcher but probably not an ace.
We have skewed more toward pitching recently, but I'm fine with it.
Ironically the pick you all like is the one I dont.
Ironically the pick you all like is the one I dont.
A pitcher with a fastball sitting 91-93, an above average curve and change, and good command is a good pitcher but probably not an ace.
Wonder if Cumberland could be moved to left field if his catching behind the plate remains a question.
So what about Groome is super special?
He sat upper 90s his last start and he could be a HS junior. I'd say its not out of the realm of possibility that he couldn't be a guy who is 92-95 and he can go get 97 and thats plenty for an ace.
You don't understand projection very well.Groome is taller, has as good a fastball, a nasty curve, and is left handed.
Honestly, I'd probably put Wentz's ceiling as higher than Anderson's.
Williams Perez was sitting at like 94 the other night. I'm always dubious of radar readings in one start. Anderson consistently worked in the low 90s. That's much more likely what we can expect.
Glavine? Maddux? There are a ton of pitchers that profile that description. You don't have to throw 98-100 to be an ace.
why not?
You don't understand projection very well.