weird when a bunch of people that spout off about the 2nd amendment roll out pictures of a kid with guns
![]()
but his parents said he never had a gun?
weird when a bunch of people that spout off about the 2nd amendment roll out pictures of a kid with guns
![]()
wow, does the 2nd amendment apply to young not white people too !!!
hardly think that was what the founders had in mind
Someone else that missed the point.
Also not surprising...
Somebody missed the point of the pictures....
Not surprising
no i didn'tYou forgot to put in the part about the gov't killing black guys after the black guys shot at the cops first.
LOL, it just keeps getting worse for the pro Brown crowd.
He wasn't gonna get charged without an entry wound from the rear. Anything else is largely hearsay to be honest, and the one person who had knowledge of what went on in the car who isn't the defendant is dead. If this wasn't a cop he'd be in jail, but it was and convicting a cop without insane evidence is nearly impossible.
that being said, he still fired at the kid while he was running away according to multiple eye witness reports.
No they weren't. But you can believe that.
Wait, so Brown was shot in the back?
Being shot at and falling down or jerking around can be missinterpreted. Being fired at while running away is something that's been reported several times from several eye witnesses. Again, you're trying to argue something that's been reported many many times. Sure they could be wrong, but truth is the odds are against it.