Yeah. A lot of people took a 3 WAR center fielder for granted.
Now we have a 5 WAR center fielder
Yeah. A lot of people took a 3 WAR center fielder for granted.
Now we have a 5 WAR center fielder
Neck needing rest is overblown. Hes just not good.
Now we have a 5 WAR center fielder
history says players get an extra 0.5 WAR if they get more rest? i'd be interested to see that data.
This board has a healthy respect for the efficacy of rest.
The rest could (and should) be accomplished by limiting his PAs against LHP. Two birds with one stone kind of thing.
I don't think Ender coming back and being healthy is all that likely. Which sucks because if he was he's clearly the 2nd best OF on the team.
I get confused on when fWAR is valid for player value and when it isn't. Bumgarner is 1.1 fWAR to Gausman's 0.8 (31.6% better), but bumgarner isn't better. In nick's case though...
I know you get confused. The source of your confusion is likely that WAR is a counting stat, while xwOBA is a rate stat. And math is hard.
WAR is effectiveness over time.
xwOBA is just effectiveness.
So when you say MadBum has 1.1 WAR over 87 IP, Gaus has 0.8 WAR over 62 IP, so therefore MadBum is better, you look like an idiot who doesn't understand 6th grade math. It's like saying the player with 11 HRs in 87 PAs is a better power hitter than the guy with 8 HRs in 62 PAs.
If two pitchers are similar in effectiveness, and one has more IP than the other, simple math dictates the guy with more IP will have a higher WAR.
Now yes, being able to complete innings certainly has value. That's why SPs are more valuable than RPs, even though RPs have a much lower xwOBA. However, moving forward, when Gausman irons out whatever is going on, he will be more effective than MadBum and his WAR will climb faster as he accumulates IP like he customarily has through his entire career.
Let me know if you are still confused. I think I have a 6th grade math textbook lying around somewhere I can reference for help.
Neck needing rest is overblown. Hes just not good.
1,000 ribbies though.
I get confused on when fWAR is valid for player value and when it isn't. Bumgarner is 1.1 fWAR to Gausman's 0.8 (31.6% better), but bumgarner isn't better. In nick's case though...
Just don’t bother. If you don’t understand one of the hundred made up stats that someone created who probably never touched a baseball or a boob on their life, then you are dumb. That is why so many people don’t follow the game anymore like they used to. You get these arrogant talkings heads or our resident asshole going on about their advanced metrics and it almost always ends in a personal attack. You don’t understand this stat so you are stupid. This type of mentality is why baseball is not what is used to be.
I find it curious you think advanced stats are 'made up' but don't feel that way about any number of traditional stats which at some point were 'made up' as well.
Just don’t bother. If you don’t understand one of the hundred made up stats that someone created who probably never touched a baseball or a boob on their life, then you are dumb. That is why so many people don’t follow the game anymore like they used to. You get these arrogant talkings heads or our resident asshole going on about their advanced metrics and it almost always ends in a personal attack. You don’t understand this stat so you are stupid. This type of mentality is why baseball is not what is used to be.
Point of fact: I've never predicted how many wins Markakis will put up in 2019. Or said he'd be "better" (whatever that means) during the offseason.
I'm well aware of his career profile, it's been discussed about 6,000 times. I've literally never disputed that he will likely regress from last season and it's always been quite possible that he would have his worst season.
I know you are beside yourself over getting a .220 BABIP month out of Markakis. Enjoy it. These are the simple pleasures of life.
I'm always been fine with upgrading Markakis, but the Braves were not signing Harper. McCutchen and Pollock were bad deals. Brantley preferred Houston. Most of the proposed trades for OFs around here were never going to happen. Some of them were actually quite dumb.
Nothing prevents Alex from making a move to upgrade Markakis though, certainly not the bargain contract Markakis signed.
I was far more happy in the first month of the season when Neck was, again, overperforming. I am far less happy to realize he has settled back in to who he truly is earlier this season.
you didn't want to put a number on it...but thought 1-1.5 WAR was low, IIRC. he will settle in at right around 1 WAR. yippee.
the fact they haven't even begun platooning him tells me they won't look to upgrade there. i hope i'm wrong. but i don't see it.