yes
cause of the stupid dead ends historically from you where you mischaracterize the conversation cause you have your end game you want to try to point out
and it doesn't matter if that point is unrelated to the conversation
it's literally a waste of time and exhausting cause you realize said person doesn't actually care.
we are at this bridge cause of many other times (history can have impact on the future. hmm, where have we had that convo before? oh yeah, some other thread where you tried to spin the point into saying something) in the past
example of a recent interaction: you went down this path cause i said if the starting point is 1/6 was just people walking around a building (like you characterize it), i then said it's silly to say a justice was almost assassinated when a person calls the cops on themselves and never actually saw the justice
i mean, either they are both nothing or they are both something then. but by your logic you have stated many times, it can't be one is serious and the other is nothing.
that's all i was pointing out and you said: "Ahh what a shock the same guy who says trump incited an insurrection simultaneously says Schumer did no invite violence on supreme court judges
And he thinks he's a free thinker.
But in reality he is a seal."
i literately never said anything of that ilk. it's also irrelevant to what i stated.
to my knowledge, the only thing i've said about the guy that went to dc with a gun and called the cops on himself was that it was another example of why we need some gun control measures etc to make sure crazy people don't get guns so easily
