I never said you're not allowed to like it. But saying it is a turd, or it sucks is just objectively wrong. Something can only suck if it's objectively bad, and generally art isn't objectively bad. Like having a .250 wOBA is objectively bad. Avante Garde music may not be your jam, but it's not really bad. Again, I don't care if you don't like it. That doesn't matter. The best movies in the world have people who don't like it. My Dad hated Dunkirk, despite near universal acclaim. I don't think less of him for it.
Well the thing is that comes down to how much you believe that the force user sees things. If you feel like it's the ability to see the future, then you're right. If it's more of an intuition to landing point, that's a different thing. If we consider the Luke training, he didn't see the future when he was working on defending the bolts from the training bot. Again the reason she stood up to Kylo despite no lightsaber training is because of the martial training, and Kylo being severely hurt, Kylo just killing his dad and being emotionally upset, and Kylo trying to recruit her. He could have smote her if he tried, but that wasn't his goal. Similar to when Luke battled Vader. Luke had no formal on screen light saber training but stands up to Vader who's by most accounts the best duelist of all time.
But it didn't move the series. It basically took 8 episodes to finally get things moving. But it's fine. Because moving plot is silly. What is the plot of the Lord of the Rings? You can right it in a paragraph, but the beauty of the story is the details.
But was it a pointless trek? It served a key purpose of character development. It also served as a potential jumping off point. Rose goes to Canto Bight and inspires hope in the downtrodden stable hand kids. Taking an area of the world that's not involved and injecting the good guys into it. After JJ and Kasden destroyed the entire republic which was the Resistance's supply line, Rian was forced to create a way to show how hope can be created by simple gestures and that you can win the battle of good vs. evil with love not hate, which harkens back to RotJ when Luke defeats the Emperor not by being the most skilled battler, or jedi, but by showing his love for his father. He could have killed Vader then battled the Emperor, but he wouldn't have won.
But how is it unfulfilling and contrived. Rey realizes that the answers to her future belong to her, not tied to her past. Kylo falls hard to the dark side setting himself up as the big bad, or for a true vader last ditch turn, Poe learns what it takes to be a leader of the resistance, Finn learns what it's like to care about something. All the main characters continued along a pretty logical path. Poe took the whole movie to learn that being a hotshot pilot has it's place but there's also a time to pull off. Finn if you remember is like weeks from leaving the first order, where he was indoctrinated since he was a kid and never lived a life outside of the life of a soldier, it was important that he saw the world outside of his minimal scope, for better or worse.
I wouldn't call it like that. To me the MCU took it's art shape under the Russos and Markus and McFeely. They defined what the MCU is now. If you look at Iron Man and watch Winter Soldier and then watch something newer, which one is closer to the format. What Iron Man did was be a commercial success. There's a few key things with the MCU. Phase One is pretty disjointed, it was a lead in for Avengers. Avengers was a huge hit, this carries over to the Dark World in a way, but Winter Soldier shakes up the format a whole lot and Guardians shows how you can play in the MCU but with something weird and different. What most people consider success in the MCU is the Russos formula which is heavy through Phase 3.