Let's Talk About Media

[zitothebrave]

Having not learned anything in engaging with you I will foolishly do so again.

Some important distinctions.

I and people like me never had issues with BLM protests. We had issues with the looting, arson, and murders. We also had issues with leaders saying protests were not allowed due to covid for things like lockdowns, churches, schools, etc... but literally joined in the BLM because they supported the cause. You'd think you would too, but that's too much an ask I guess.

Secondly, the premise of their protests is faulty and not based in reality. That's OK... they still have a right to protest... but I believe they are wildly misinformed on their grievance. They would be wise to get educated

On the Canada side... to my knowledge, there is no property destruction happening. Nobody has been murdered. It is the definition of a peaceful protest and civil disobedience

Secondly, the premise of the protest is fully legitimate. They are being mandated by their government to inject something in their body they do not want. They do not have freedom of movement. They cannot even shop in grocery stores in many areas, and they cannot leave their own country. This is a huge human rights violation that they are protesting loudly, and peavefully

Finally, Canada's response to this protest is full on authoritarian. They are stealing property from them, like gas and wood. They are forcing private companies to not deliver donated funds to the cause. They are seizing bank accounts of protesters and those who are supporting them. They have invoked essentially marshal law - which they have never done in their history. They are labeling the protestors as terrorists, and are arresting them without cause.

You can decide to think that protest is stupid, and that the government response is just. I think you are on the wrong side of history - but leftists always find themselves on the side of the tyrants

So this is a whole lot of nothing here that didn't answer my question. Why is it ok to condemn BLM for millions in damages. But not condemn this for the hundreds of millions they've done in economic damages.

Seriously you're dodging the key questiosn to state your beliefs.

 

[sturg33]

I honestly do not know how I can more plainly explain such a simple concept to you.

 

[zitothebrave]

I honestly do not know how I can more plainly explain such a simple concept to you.

You're not explaining a concept, you're dodging my question. Which is fine, just be real.

 

[Tapate50]

So this is a whole lot of nothing here that didn't answer my question. Why is it ok to condemn BLM for millions in damages. But not condemn this for the hundreds of millions they've done in economic damages.

Seriously you're dodging the key questiosn to state your beliefs.

If economic losses were a criminal offense the whole US govt would be in jail for the lockdowns, but it isn't

Some rudimentary reading of state and national law still shows murder, arson, robbery, theft and looting still is against the law.

 

[thethe]

If economic losses were a criminal offense the whole US govt would be in jail for the lockdowns, but it isn't

Some rudimentary reading of state and national law still shows murder, arson, robbery, theft and looting still is against the law.

Only the government is allowed to devastate their people economically.

When the serfs fight back you have pathetic leftists denouncing them.

Just remember that when someone from the left claims they are for the 'people'.

 

[zitothebrave]

If economic losses were a criminal offense the whole US govt would be in jail for the lockdowns, but it isn't

Some rudimentary reading of state and national law still shows murder, arson, robbery, theft and looting still is against the law.

Disruption of International Commerce isn't against the law? Interesting.

 

[sturg33]

Intentionally destroying something =\= to intentionally disrupting something being made.

You have proven you are incapable of critical thinking. And have made your side clear. You have sided with the tyrant's at every turn

 

[sturg33]

A friendly reminder that the government shut down commerce across both countries... This was never legislated...

And zito cheered the entire way

 

[sturg33]

Meanwhile, the media is now doxing the people who donated to the truckers. They are the enemy of the people in every sense of the word

Trump was right about that

 

[zitothebrave]

Meanwhile, the media is now doxing the people who donated to the truckers. They are the enemy of the people in every sense of the word

Trump was right about that

First Amendment Lover here.

 

[sturg33]

Something something hollow arguments

 

[sturg33]

Omar becoming a voice of reason against these tyrants in an unexpected turn

[Tw]1494083595689943045[/tw]

 

[Tapate50]

Intentionally destroying something =\= to intentionally disrupting something being made.

You have proven you are incapable of critical thinking. And have made your side clear. You have sided with the tyrant's at every turn

Yeah wild the hoops you gotta twist through.

BLm was intentionally blocking emergency calls in Tennessee. Like to kids trapped in a car.

The two are in no way the same

 

[Jaw]

Having not learned anything in engaging with you I will foolishly do so again.

Some important distinctions.

I and people like me never had issues with BLM protests. We had issues with the looting, arson, and murders. We also had issues with leaders saying protests were not allowed due to covid for things like lockdowns, churches, schools, etc... but literally joined in the BLM because they supported the cause. You'd think you would too, but that's too much an ask I guess.

Secondly, the premise of their protests is faulty and not based in reality. That's OK... they still have a right to protest... but I believe they are wildly misinformed on their grievance. They would be wise to get educated

On the Canada side... to my knowledge, there is no property destruction happening. Nobody has been murdered. It is the definition of a peaceful protest and civil disobedience

Secondly, the premise of the protest is fully legitimate. They are being mandated by their government to inject something in their body they do not want. They do not have freedom of movement. They cannot even shop in grocery stores in many areas, and they cannot leave their own country. This is a huge human rights violation that they are protesting loudly, and peavefully

Finally, Canada's response to this protest is full on authoritarian. They are stealing property from them, like gas and wood. They are forcing private companies to not deliver donated funds to the cause. They are seizing bank accounts of protesters and those who are supporting them. They have invoked essentially marshal law - which they have never done in their history. They are labeling the protestors as terrorists, and are arresting them without cause.

You can decide to think that protest is stupid, and that the government response is just. I think you are on the wrong side of history - but leftists always find themselves on the side of the tyrants

This was the best post on here in a while.

 

[Jaw]

Yeah wild the hoops you gotta twist through.

BLm was intentionally blocking emergency calls in Tennessee. Like to kids trapped in a car.

The two are in no way the same

Where was the video taken of the protesters surrounding ambulances with injured people are already inside, while women jumped on top of the ambulance and twerked? I want to say St. Louis.

 

[Jaw]

Where was the video taken of the protesters surrounding ambulances with injured people are already inside, while women jumped on top of the ambulance and twerked? I want to say St. Louis.

My mistake, that was an Oakland Juneteenth celebration.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...wd-celebrating-Juneteenth-scene-shooting.html

Multiple women were seen twerking on the top of an ambulance in Lake Merritt in Oakland, California on Saturday night, as paramedics attempted to make their way through to the scene of a shooting in which one person was killed and at least seven others were wounded.

The ambulance was stopped in its tracks by the crowd which was said to be around 1,000-strong as people gathered to celebrate Juneteenth after it was declared a federal holiday.

As the ambulance arrived at the scene, the revelers continued to party, with no apparent regard for the seriousness of the situation that just occurred nearby.

When the ambulance could go no further, at least five women began twerking at the side while another pair jumped on the hood of the emergency vehicle.

At least one person was also spotted on top of the roof at one point.

Video footage of the incident has gone viral on Twitter, showing Juneteenth partiers not only ignoring the Oakland shooting, but using the ambulance as a vehicle for them to use for their own enjoyment.

Police were on the scene to monitor the situation, they announced on Facebook, when shots rang out at 6:22 p.m.

 

[zitothebrave]

Yeah wild the hoops you gotta twist through.

BLm was intentionally blocking emergency calls in Tennessee. Like to kids trapped in a car.

The two are in no way the same

Freedom Convoy never blocked emergency vehicle access. Yup that never has happened.

 

[Tapate50]

If they did say can still condemn that action.

To my knowledge no one cared during the riots because causes

 

[Jaw]

If they did say can still condemn that action.

To my knowledge no one cared during the riots because causes

Pretty sure we were told that people who complained about increased emergency response times were showing their privilege, and that just justified the fiery but mostly peaceful protests even more.

 

[Garmel]