Runnin
Well-known member
The 70's were a strange time.
If bi-racial works better for you, go for it. I was going for alliteration.
Meme & Quote Thread
- Thread starter sturg33
- Start date
If bi-racial works better for you, go for it. I was going for alliteration.
Oklahomahawk
Boras' Client
Beds, you should contact an attorney about whatever hoops you'd need to go through to get Mr. Brunson officially declared a "special interest". Then no matter who the president was they'd be busting their butts to help him.
sturg33
I
Hahahahahaha
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
Well, the gospels are increasingly important to me, and I am making a genuine effort to modify my behavior to reflect my growing but still limited understanding of them. I typically change the signature when I find myself falling short of the new verses, as a reminder to myself to do better. It also serves as a filter on what I type, since I don't want to post something vile with what I consider to be a meaningful message appended at the end.
57's retweet factory is based on nothing of the kind, it's merely an attempt to score imaginary points in what he and his line leaders consider to be a fun game.
sturg33
I
I think it would be a fun exercise if you would explain to me how $1 in SNAP results in a 73% growth in economic activity
57Brave
Well-known member
this isn't hard. If you question a number, you Google it and it will either confirm or rebut the claim
quit asking people to do your research for you.
I think I am the only one here that still accommodates you
https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/foo...on-assistance-program-snap/economic-linkages/
quit asking people to do your research for you.
I think I am the only one here that still accommodates you
https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/foo...on-assistance-program-snap/economic-linkages/
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
I think it would be even more fun for you to explain why you think it doesn't.
sturg33
I
Because I don't think confiscating $1 from someone, paying for all of wasteful spending and bureaucratic processes, then handing it back to someone to spend, results in in a 73% increase from the original confiscation.
I could be wrong of course... but again, I'd be curious to see how that works... and if it does, why doesn't our massive deficits result in more than a meager 2% GDP growth?
Runnin
Well-known member
The short answer seems to be "inter-industry and induced consumption effects."
You are wrong and a 5 second search would show you. Your quixotic philosophy doesn't translate well into numbers.
SNAP Stimulates Economic Activity During an Economic Downturn
When households spend their SNAP benefits, the direct effects are increased economic activity by the producers of the goods and services being purchased, as well as by the retail, wholesale and transportation system that delivers the goods and services. In an economic downturn when resources are underemployed, increased SNAP benefits start a multiplier process with an economic impact that is greater than the initial stimulus (direct effect). The multiplier effect results from inter-industry and induced consumption effects. Inter-industry effects arise from an increase in economic activity among those industries that provide input supplies to producers and a delivery system for purchased goods. Induced consumption effects arise from increased consumption expenditures by households that receive an increase in earnings from the additional work generated by new economic production activity.
Runnin
Well-known member
I answered one. Why don't you do something beside troll for a change? Do you even know how to cut and paste?
sturg33
I
I asked a question that you don't know how to answer... don't get mad at me about that little one
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
And if you do clap its proof everyone loves Donald. Check and mate.
