Neverending **** the Police thread.

https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesma...f-culpable-negligence-vZ93iWEliU6z7KfwIMZYKg/



The officer that tried to murder an autistic man but instead shot his black caretaker has been found guilty of misdemeanor culpable negligence. He was found not guilty of attempted manslaughter by some miraclenor really biased jury. The criminal cop said he thought the black man was a hostage and the autistic man was going to shoot him. What I dont understand is if the black man was the hostage of the autistic man why did police point guns at the black man and order him to get on his stomach with his hands in the air? He was only a hostage in the since that police would have murdered him if he didnt follow their commands. If he I'd a hostage they could have let him walk right to them because Ethel autistic man was much smaller and in no way preventing the therapist from leaving. The douchebag also says dnhe mistook the victims screaming that everything was okay and that there was no gun and no one was in danger as the black man pleading for help..... to top it off the criminal still thinks he should be a police officer.
 
cajunrevenge said:
https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesma...sarm-in-gun-free-zone-c8Idj44F7E2UssWe-Od6Xg/




Security guard attempts to take an on duty police officer into custody for refusing to disarm in a gun free zone......the officer resisted arrest and the the security guard was later arrested for "menacing". The guard is obviously in the wrong but I think it's funny how police react to situations like this. They act like a gun pointing at them is a HUGE deal but dont understand why people dont like having cops point their guns at them. Menacing is the crime I think should be used against police.



If the cop had pulled his gun and the security guard would have shot him I would have sided with the guard. Police have been clear that fearing for your life is a justifiable reason to kill someone even if an officer had no legal justification for detaining or arresting the person.
Click to expand...




Heres the video. Still wondering how and why the police officer is allowed to conduct personal business while on duty. How often does he do this?
 
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news...-gets-deal-rape-case-after-years-cour/499220/



Georgia House Speaker uses his position to delay the trial of a child rapist to the point that the prosecution has to accept a 10 year probation plea deal to ensure that he doesnt get off by stalling until the victims memories become distant memories. From other places i have read that he even used the excuse that he had to go campaign and raise money as to why he could not attend court.....
 



Heres a fun one. 2 cops have a man detained. A passerby makes a comment. The cops viciously attack him. They arrest him and when he asks what he is under arrest for the cop says "take your charge like a man" and "because you dont now how to act right". Turns out the charged him with ole catch all charge called Disorderly Conduct. You see, being tackled from behind is apparently disorderly conduct. Sadly this is not the first time I have seen a cop arrest someone for disorderly conduct for being tackled from behind by a cop. One cop tries to calm down the criminal but he tells that cop to "leave my scene and dont ever tell me how to do my job".



That criminal cop is now facing charges of false imprisonment which is a correct charge rarely used for false arrests. Should be kidnapping charges too.
 



Officer is fired for trying to stop another officer from checking a handcuffed suspect. Ironically the cop she stopped later retired after he was suspended for choking another police officer and another separate incident when he was off duty where he punched another cop. He was also later indicted for civil rights violations stemming from his arrest of a son of another Buffalo cop. Cant make this **** up.
 
https://studionewsnetwork.com/news/...tained-by-police-after-retired-cop-calls-911/




2 black realtors stop to look at a house. A retired cop down the street calls 911 saying the saw them in real intimate the house, specifically stating they kicked in the front door. Officers arrive, threaten the men at gun point, search, detain, and handcuff them. Then they find out they tot in using the realtor lock box. Now the retiree officer says he didnt get a good look and was mistaken. That's bullcrap. As soon as the cops found out this was a hoax call they should have started investigating the retired cop. At no point did he say he didnt get a good look or that he was not 100% certain they broke in. These men could have been killed if they made the wrong move.
 
https://www.propublica.org/article/elkhart-indiana-police-ricky-joyner-conviction



Here is a story about a guy wrongfully convicted. It shows just how ****ed up the uneven playing field is when its a normal person vs the state. Evidence thrown out by a judge. Try again in a neighboring county. Most judges are former prosecutors and many are ridiculously biased in favor of police/prosecutors. Dont have enough evidence to get a subpoena? Move the local jail house snitch to his cell. Seems kind of odd to me that a person in jail for armed robbery is believable when snitching on his cell mate but not believable if he snitches on police. Funny how that works. The best evidence in the case was some fake ass pseudo science where they claim a trash bag found over the victims head came from the same roll that was in the defendants apartment.
 




Here is footage from Officer Wester who I posted about that was indicted for framing hundreds of innocent people. Watch him conduct the roadside drug test. Keep in mind that red means negative and blue means positive for drugs. It is red as all hell the whole damn time. Officer Wester actually holds it up to look at it while its shiny red and says "blue" then goes arrest the victim. Later he comes back to the test he had left in his trunk and looks at it, it is still red. After telling the victim it tested positive for meth he tries to get the guy to admit he knew drugs were in his vehicle which he does not as he is dumbfounded at what is going on. Using government authority to frame people should be a mandatory life sentence. You might not die from being framed like this but you wont ever be the same after it happens to you. It is like spiritually raping a person.
 




Here is an example of something that should be seen as red flag for police officers. These people are riding their bikes. Cop comes and tell them they cant do that. When the person cites the law his response is "oh thats the way you want to go" and later says "so where did you get your law degree". If a cop takes a person accurately citing the law as antagonizing behavior then there is something seriously wrong with that cop. Any of us should be able to have a civil discussion of what the law is without the cop being butt hurt that his authority is being challenged.
 




Here is video of the black realtor and prospective home buyer that someone called the police on. The newsreport at the end says that the former police officer who lied about them kicking down the door cant be sued because people who call police to report a crime have immunity. Not sure how the hell that works out. Could we not then just call the police and make up anything we want? They are suing the city but the police officers in this case acted very appropriate. They cant help that they got false information. There was nothing the guys were doing to indicate they were a threat or involved in criminal activity. Its reasonable to handcuff people they were told broke in, they could have been like some of these douche cops and give them complicated orders for a long distance and shoot them if they make any sort of mistake.
 


Watch this traffic stop.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.desmoinesregister.com/amp/2362251002




More in this officer. It notes one case where this officer started following a black man driving because "something about his turn didnt feel right". Then after not making any traffic violations he could be pulled over for the driver parked his car. The officer then approached the vehicle and conducted a traffic stop using the probable cause as the vehicle being parked too close to a fire hydrant. Problem is there was no way for see that they were parked close to a fire hydrant until after he started the traffic stop. The judge found the officer not credible and the the case out.
 
Last edited:



Ok people this is going to far. Some cops got splashed with some water. Give me a break. If cops were this outraged over false convictions and false arrests people might actually respect them. Kudos to the cops who didnt resort to violence in these videos.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top