Neverending **** the Police thread.

nsacpi said:
But really does anyone doubt the basic conclusion. And these cops are cops who are being recorded from their own recording devices. So they are on their best behavior.

It leaves out certain things that are inherently more difficult to code. Like body language and tone. But words alone show a difference.
Click to expand...

So this is the point where you exit from this amazing study and say we just 'know?

How can anything be solved this way. Are you not in favor of the scientific method?

You've claimed a hypothesis. You brought a study to the table. And now you are already making excuses for how the study couldn't capture the absolute truth?

You dont see anything wrong with this?

If this is in fact happening and its happening at a rate greater for blacks as we are all scolded into believing....wouldn't it show up SOMEWHERE in the data?
 
thethe said:
So this is the point where you exit from this amazing study and say we just 'know?

How can anything be solved this way. Are you not in favor of the scientific method?

You've claimed a hypothesis. You brought a study to the table. And now you are already making excuses for how the study couldn't capture the absolute truth?

You dont see anything wrong with this?

If this is in fact happening and its happening at a rate greater for blacks as we are all scolded into believing....wouldn't it show up SOMEWHERE in the data?
Click to expand...

That's how you do a scientific study.

You have a null hypothesis: police speak the same way to blacks and whites.

You collect data in a way that the observer's bias cannot affect the data.

And test your hypothesis.

How else do you do research?
 
thethe said:
listen Dalyn I've always respected you in the past and our interactions have been pleasant. If you don't want to discuss the actual results of what's happening in the field then why even speak to me?
Click to expand...

Fair enough. None of this feels like a discussion, really, at this point.
 
nsacpi said:
That's how you do a scientific study.

You have a null hypothesis: police speak the same way to blacks and whites.

You collect data in a way that the observer's bias cannot affect the data.

And test your hypothesis.

How else do you do research?
Click to expand...

Oh...i think they performed the study correctly. But the conclusion made was drastically exaggerated based on how they defined disrespectful. I mean ..it is stanford so not the most 'manly' society.

I'm more talking about you and how you abandoned the research quickly almost immediately upon me asking questions.
 
We are doing a very anti-data movement to make substantial change in society

We just did this with covid

The communists are and will win
 
That's what words can do, by the way. They are powerful things. Like getting pulled over by police and being the one called dude while everyone else is called sir and/or ma'am. Or using a phrase that was used in an incredibly racist context years ago. That sort of thing. It adds up, and it boils over.
 
sturg33 said:
We are doing a very anti-data movement to make substantial change in society

We just did this with covid

The communists are and will win
Click to expand...

That study i would expect from someone like 57.

Is this the best research to show 'systemitc racism' within the police function? Enough to start using slogans such as 'defund the police?

What we are seeing lacks any rationality. I feel like I'm in an episode of the twilight zone.
 
Dalyn said:
That's what words can do, by the way. They are powerful things. Like getting pulled over by police and being the one called dude while everyone else is called sir and/or ma'am. Or using a phrase that was used in an incredibly racist context years ago. That sort of thing. It adds up, and it boils over.
Click to expand...

If something like bro or dude bubbles over into what we are seeing then people have the grow the **** up. This is not evidence of systemic racism.
 
thethe said:
If something like bro or dude bubbles over into what we are seeing then people have the grow the **** up. This is not evidence of systemic racism.
Click to expand...

It's just part of it. A piece of a much larger ****ty puzzle. People don't want to be treated differently.
 
thethe said:
If something like bro or dude bubbles over into what we are seeing then people have the grow the **** up. This is not evidence of systemic racism.
Click to expand...

There is other research on being cuffed, being tased, having a gun drawn at you etc etc.

Everyone can draw their own conclusions.
 
It's easy to mock microagressions and all that but the way you shake someone's hand or acknowledge them makes a big difference. And the racial inequities go well beyond cops. Cops are more or less reflections of society.
 
nsacpi said:
It's easy to mock microagressions and all that but the way you shake someone's hand or acknowledge them makes a big difference. And the racial inequities go well beyond cops. Cops are more or less reflections of society.
Click to expand...

Or maybe its colloquial. Or maybe its because on average white people are more stuck up and won't respond as well to endearing terms. Id rather be referred to as bro than sir in every situation.
 
nsacpi said:
There is other research on being cuffed, being tased, having a gun drawn at you etc etc.

Everyone can draw their own conclusions.
Click to expand...

Please share it. Hope its better than the rock solid theory of micro aggressions.

Feminist culture seeping its way into race studies, specifically with a race that has lost the least amount of their natural masculinity. What could go wrong?
 
[Tw]1268296487802462210[/tw]

The narrative is so grossly exaggerated its teetering on a flat out lie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top