I thought comp picks were on the table in the labor discussions? Thought they were going to do away with them.
I thought comp picks were on the table in the labor discussions? Thought they were going to do away with them.
I totally agree re the valuation trend of Pache and Waters, but I see no reason to think Contreras’ value is trending down. His AAA stats, plus underlying metrics at MLB, all point to a very good hitting guy who can probably also catch.
Has to be a reason AA signed and resigned 2 MLB proven catchers.
The problem is that the further these conversations go, the less attractive they become. Without even starting down the road of questioning valuations, it's incredibly hard to understand the reasoning for "gutting" the top end of the system for Olson - regardless of whether Pache/Waters/Contreras/Langeliers/Harris EVER reach anything close to their ceilings.
If the supposed cash windfall from winning the Series is actually there - and you're NOT going to spend it on Freeman - why not splurge on Scherzer rather than talking Morton into coming back? You're spending $40 million either way. If there's extra money lying around and you've completely lost faith in Pache/Waters and are willing to trade guys like Langeliers and Harris for 2 years of Olson rather than giving Freeman too many years, why not sign Rizzo to a short-term deal, add another OF or SP, and hold onto your depth.
If you're trading that type of talent (that isn't even 23 years old yet) for 2 seasons of Olson, why didn't you spend the "excess cash" on guys like Scherzer/Marte/Seager/etc. rather than throw away all your depth on someone you'd control for two years? If there are REALLY as many teams interested in trading for Olson as it seems and you supposedly have extra cash lying around to spend, why not gut the system for Olson and spend that money on a much better CF like Marte or SP like Scherzer if you could have gotten them for the same number of years they signed for? All those are impossible to explain away as anything other than win-now moves. Bringing Freddie back would likely be defined as the same, - just as gutting the top of the system for two years of Olson to keep from signing Freeman for 6 years would.
(I'm not inferring I know or understand that answer by any stretch - just an honest question.)
The easy answer is AA probably doesn't have some huge windfall to spend, or at least not large enough to accomplish all that. Perhaps they can afford a $180M payroll just for 2022, but then need to pare it down to $160M in subsequent years because they can't project a deep playoff run into the budget every year.
The slightly less easy answer is AA seems to value financial flexibility almost above all else, so Committing to 2 years of Olson carries extra value in that regard. If prospects aren't going to contribute to the MLB roster (which is why I say Lango and Harris are off limits...they still have a chance to be real MLB contributors for the Braves), the only other way they provide value is freeing up payroll space by being traded for cheap MLB talent. Olson represents Freeman-level production for a fraction of the cost, so that's an acceptable way to deploy prospect capital.
The more complicated answer may be that AA truly thought the 5/135 offer to Freeman was going to be good enough, or close to good enough, to get it done. That was a reasonable assumption in my opinion, but now the agent is digging in for something AA considers unreasonable. So AA had a huge chunk of the budget earmarked for Freeman, and all of the other options for that cash are gone. So now maybe AA must decide between throwing crazy money at Freeman, or pivoting to a plan centered around Olson/Rizzo.
Pretty sure that would begin next offseason. Especially since a lot of the guys who signed before the CBA expired happened under the comp picks being allowed, so can't shift that for the second half of the offseason. I'd imagine they would all just start at once next offseason.
The more we hear about just how interested the other suitors have been in Freeman, the more I start to feel like he's going to sign elsewhere. I think the Jays are a legitimate darkhorse for splurging on him - Vlad Jr. moving back to 3B isn't ideal for them, but Freddie's LH bat certainly is. Vladdy could rotate between 1B/3B/DH. Groshans isn't far away, and they could sign a veteran utility IF like Josh Harrison/Asdrubal Cabrera/Jed Lowrie/Donovan Solano to give them someone to play defense at 2B or 3B late in games if needed.
I think they could make an Olson trade work. And he’s gonna make 12 million this year so that leaves a lot more to upgrade the outfield.
Yeah i think he's gone too, i just hope AA has a good backup plan in place. Because there's not many options if FF does indeed depart. I'm not sure we have the farm for Olson. Rizzo on a short-term deal is only other option i guess. And then i guess splurge on a top tier outfielder or shortstop i guess with the extra funds? I'd imagine Freeman makes a decision relatively quickly once FA is back on.
So question. What happens to all these contracts if the season gets canceled?