Rittenhouse trial

Not to mention the armed losers will harming property and potential threats to humans.

Oh, and one was a rapist

As goldy would say, build.a statue for Kyle
 
He shot and killed 2 injured one.
Your rationalization is harming property that wasn't his, nor was he officially deputized to protect that property or " potential threats to humans"

As far as " rapist" what on earth does that have to do with that night.

He already has a statue
/==≈======
Drew Smyly sucks
 
He shot and killed 2 injured one.
Your rationalization is harming property that wasn't his, nor was he officially deputized to protect that property or " potential threats to humans"

As far as " rapist" what on earth does that have to do with that night.

He already has a statue
/==≈======
Drew Smyly sucks


Are you really that dense?
 
Carrying the weapon was a crime. No one has denied that. The gang of rioters also committed a crime when they attacked him. Unfortunately for them, their crime enabled his right to defend himself. As the saying goes, better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. Or as Goldy likes to say, they ****ed around and found out.
 
Curious what I am seeing wrong. A 17 year old white kid illegally carried a weapon into a volatile area then shot and killed 2 unarmed people.
White people here tripping over each other rationalzing/ justifying his actions.

Those are things that happened.

If you think he needs to go to jail for being white, then just say so and stop arguing terrible points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
According to a theory of social psychology called the “weapons effect,” the mere sight of a gun inspires aggression. In 1967, the psychologists Leonard Berkowitz and Anthony LePage wrote, “In essence, the gun helps pull the trigger.” Their methodology had flaws, but later studies verified their premise. In one U.K. study, people were more inclined to assault a police officer who was visibly armed with a Taser. Brad Bushman, an Ohio State researcher who served on President Barack Obama’s committee on gun violence, told me, “We’ve found that it really doesn’t matter if a good guy or a bad guy is carrying the gun—it creates the bias to interpret things in a hostile way.” Citizens who openly carry firearms “think that they are making the situation safer, but they are making it much more dangerous.”


https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/07/05/kyle-rittenhouse-american-vigilante
 
According to a theory of social psychology called the “weapons effect,” the mere sight of a gun inspires aggression. In 1967, the psychologists Leonard Berkowitz and Anthony LePage wrote, “In essence, the gun helps pull the trigger.” Their methodology had flaws, but later studies verified their premise. In one U.K. study, people were more inclined to assault a police officer who was visibly armed with a Taser. Brad Bushman, an Ohio State researcher who served on President Barack Obama’s committee on gun violence, told me, “We’ve found that it really doesn’t matter if a good guy or a bad guy is carrying the gun—it creates the bias to interpret things in a hostile way.” Citizens who openly carry firearms “think that they are making the situation safer, but they are making it much more dangerous.”


https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/07/05/kyle-rittenhouse-american-vigilante


And this has nothing to do with the case
 
I am in disbelief that a member of the gun grabbing committee of the most anti-2A president of my lifetime thinks it's a bad idea for Citizens to be armed. I look forward to reading his recommendation to the former President that the Secret Service agents protecting him do so unarmed, to better prevent aggression toward the President.
 
Well that new footage certainly should close this thread down.

Why are we just now seeing thermal footage of this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
Well that new footage certainly should close this thread down.

Why are we just now seeing thermal footage of this?

You know the answer to that.

The deep state is the enemy of the American people.

They detest anyone right of communist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
I honestly think anyone involved in the rioting shares the blame for this incident. Not legal blame but moral blame. This is the kind of crap that happens when you riot. You put that many people together with tensions running that high and remove the rule of law and you get this. It was predictable.

I honestly don't have much of an opinion on Rittenhouse. Under all scenarios he's an idiot for going into that situation. But being an idiot isn't illegal. He's been charged with specific crimes and it's the job of the prosecution to prove that he committed them and a jury will decide his fate. I trust the process here.
 
Dang it Striker, had you watched the news you would know they were rioting for the public good. It was more beneficial than staying in lockdown, according to the experts.
 
Can you imagine being so stupid you actually thought that what Rittenhouse did was wrong?
 
Back
Top