Sucks this all had to happen because your side let in the hordes from the third world.
Kind of crazy how all these crazy abusive things ICE is doing to simply protect themselves from rabid leftists are being done to people who don’t end up charged with a crime. DHS is defending the conduct by claiming she crashed into them and violently resisted arrest. So why would we not want to throw the book at such a violent criminal if it went down that way?
El oh ElSucks this all had to happen because your side let in the hordes from the third world.
Too bad - it’s not going to be pretty undoing what happened under autopen.
I wish accountability worked this way for normal people and not just the President and his roaming goon squad. Federal agents treating citizens like NPCs in a Grand Theft Auto game is not the fault of Joe Biden’s immigration policy. It’s an active choice being made.Sucks this all had to happen because your side let in the hordes from the third world.
Too bad - it’s not going to be pretty undoing what happened under autopen.
It is actually.I wish accountability worked this way for normal people and not just the President and his roaming goon squad. Federal agents treating citizens like NPCs in a Grand Theft Auto game is not the fault of Joe Biden’s immigration policy. It’s an active choice being made.
Yes this person lost all their freedoms. Got it.El oh El
Hey your freedoms guaranteed by the constitution don't matter because Trump says so.
And of course retard boy is right in line with you liking your moronic post.
Have you ever even read the constitution. Here let me help youYes this person lost all their freedoms. Got it.
It might take a little longer, but you can absolutely still deport a lot of people without playing bumper cars with people then dragging them out of their vehicles and detaining them for… apparently no reason?It is actually.
You can’t open the door to the million people and expect the expulsion to be clean
hey remember when the government set up snitch hotlines to call the cops on your neighbor for having a friend in their home?Have you ever even read the constitution. Here let me help you
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
YOu can't just black bag american citizens, it's illegal.
And could the cops enter the residency without a warrant?hey remember when the government set up snitch hotlines to call the cops on your neighbor for having a friend in their home?
not legally... but they violated the law anyway when they arrested people for attending church or swimming in the ocean. if memory serves you cheeredAnd could the cops enter the residency without a warrant?
And those rights are still gone for this person?Have you ever even read the constitution. Here let me help you
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
YOu can't just black bag american citizens, it's illegal.
"A little longer"It might take a little longer, but you can absolutely still deport a lot of people without playing bumper cars with people then dragging them out of their vehicles and detaining them for… apparently no reason?
They’d still have an enormous budget to run vast operations doing most of what you’re already wanting if they simply didn’t rip Americans out of their cars for what was officially not a crime."A little longer"
ok
Were there 4th amendment rights violated when they were illegally arrested without a warrant?And those rights are still gone for this person?
They were disappeared and killed?
They were arrested for violating a law in a clear and flagrant method. If the beach is closed, someone out on the beach is violating the law. You can argue the validity of the law. But you're comparing apples and oranges and even you should know that.not legally... but they violated the law anyway when they arrested people for attending church or swimming in the ocean. if memory serves you cheered
What law supersedes the 1st amendment allowing you to freely worship?They were arrested for violating a law in a clear and flagrant method. If the beach is closed, someone out on the beach is violating the law. You can argue the validity of the law. But you're comparing apples and oranges and even you should know that.
I only ever saw a single arrest at a church I can find on research.What law supersedes the 1st amendment allowing you to freely worship?