Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

A distant relative receives SNAP and SSI income because of anxiety so severe that it keeps this person from working. Fortunately, it doesn’t keep the person from taking the kids to the zoo, the mall, Disney, Dollywood, Carowinds, etc.
 

Kind of crazy how all these crazy abusive things ICE is doing to simply protect themselves from rabid leftists are being done to people who don’t end up charged with a crime. DHS is defending the conduct by claiming she crashed into them and violently resisted arrest. So why would we not want to throw the book at such a violent criminal if it went down that way?
Sucks this all had to happen because your side let in the hordes from the third world.

Too bad - it’s not going to be pretty undoing what happened under autopen.
 
Last edited:
Sucks this all had to happen because your side let in the hordes from the third world.

Too bad - it’s not going to be pretty undoing what happened under autopen.
El oh El

Hey your freedoms guaranteed by the constitution don't matter because Trump says so.

And of course retard boy is right in line with you liking your moronic post.
 
Sucks this all had to happen because your side let in the hordes from the third world.

Too bad - it’s not going to be pretty undoing what happened under autopen.
I wish accountability worked this way for normal people and not just the President and his roaming goon squad. Federal agents treating citizens like NPCs in a Grand Theft Auto game is not the fault of Joe Biden’s immigration policy. It’s an active choice being made.
 
I wish accountability worked this way for normal people and not just the President and his roaming goon squad. Federal agents treating citizens like NPCs in a Grand Theft Auto game is not the fault of Joe Biden’s immigration policy. It’s an active choice being made.
It is actually.

You can’t open the door to the million people and expect the expulsion to be clean
 
Yes this person lost all their freedoms. Got it.
Have you ever even read the constitution. Here let me help you

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."


YOu can't just black bag american citizens, it's illegal.
 
It is actually.

You can’t open the door to the million people and expect the expulsion to be clean
It might take a little longer, but you can absolutely still deport a lot of people without playing bumper cars with people then dragging them out of their vehicles and detaining them for… apparently no reason?
 
Have you ever even read the constitution. Here let me help you

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."


YOu can't just black bag american citizens, it's illegal.
hey remember when the government set up snitch hotlines to call the cops on your neighbor for having a friend in their home?
 
Have you ever even read the constitution. Here let me help you

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."


YOu can't just black bag american citizens, it's illegal.
And those rights are still gone for this person?

They were disappeared and killed?
 
It might take a little longer, but you can absolutely still deport a lot of people without playing bumper cars with people then dragging them out of their vehicles and detaining them for… apparently no reason?
"A little longer"

ok
 
not legally... but they violated the law anyway when they arrested people for attending church or swimming in the ocean. if memory serves you cheered
They were arrested for violating a law in a clear and flagrant method. If the beach is closed, someone out on the beach is violating the law. You can argue the validity of the law. But you're comparing apples and oranges and even you should know that.
 
They were arrested for violating a law in a clear and flagrant method. If the beach is closed, someone out on the beach is violating the law. You can argue the validity of the law. But you're comparing apples and oranges and even you should know that.
What law supersedes the 1st amendment allowing you to freely worship?
 
Back
Top