IQ for one - recent historical precedence for civil rule for anotherI'm glad you have the secret formula for figuring these thangs out.
Last edited:
IQ for one - recent historical precedence for civil rule for anotherI'm glad you have the secret formula for figuring these thangs out.
As far as I can tell, the claim that a school was blown up by a faulty Iranian missile appears to rest on the misrepresented image of a misfire that was 800 miles away.What shit was made up?
we will assimilate you...all resistance is futile
An excellent use of the interactive dummy variable. I will use that example next time I teach econometrics and will be sure to credit you and thethe. I will add an intercept term, however, as my modest contribution for improving the fit.
Just normal expansion I'm sure....
Hmmm… let’s go with “civilian concern”An excellent use of the interactive dummy variable. I will use that example next time I teach econometrics and will be sure to credit you and thethe. I will add an intercept term, however, as my modest contribution for improving the fit.
Hmm. On second thought I have a question. What is the dependent variable?
Not shouldn’t be concerned. Just less confidence they we can help stabilize the country. Figured that would be obvious to even midsHmmm… let’s go with “civilian concern”
Libyans are low IQ thus we shouldn’t concern ourselves with what happens after their liberation. Iranians on the other hand
You started with made up bullshit - Iran definitely told the truth.As far as I can tell, the claim that a school was blown up by a faulty Iranian missile appears to rest on the misrepresented image of a misfire that was 800 miles away.
It’s super relevant - sorry it offends youOnly took you two weeks to recycle this outage bait:
Again, your rebuttals to this claim thus far have essentially been “actually here’s a photograph showing that Iran did it with this failed missile launch from 800 miles away” and then simply “nuh uh” despite the US refraining from comment thus far so I’m not seeing a compelling argument yet.You started with made up bullshit - Iran definitely told the truth.
It’s absurd we have to even refute a claim that Iran said but here we are - you believing Iran.Again, your rebuttals to this claim thus far have essentially been “actually here’s a photograph showing that Iran did it with this failed missile launch from 800 miles away” and then simply “nuh uh” despite the US refraining from comment thus far so I’m not seeing a compelling argument yet.
What do you personally think happened?It’s absurd we have to even refute a claim that Iran said but here we are - you believing Iran.
Two thingsWhat do you personally think happened?
Two things
1. Misfire from Iran because they were frantic and surprised at the ferocity of the attacks
2. False flag to get the world sentiment on their side
Additional follow up questions:
What is the evidence you’re using to support these beliefs?
In the absence of other forms evidence, would you be convinced this was what happened simply because the government told you this is what happened? If so, how would you ever determine if the government was lying to you?
Why? What is the incentive of the American government to own up to it if they can rely on their voters to believe them instead of questioning them?For (1) Iran is not as organized and militarily adept as made out to be
For (2) Iran has proven it doesn't care about killing innocent civilians
My overarching thought - IT'S FUCKING IRAN.
If this was a US strike then eventually the US would own up to it just like they have on mistakes in the past. But I'm certainly not going to run with something fucking IRAN says. You should be ashamed of yourself for doing that. They just slaughtered tens of thousands of their own citizens for trying to be free.
Why have they ever owned up to it then?Why? What is the incentive of the American government to own up to it if they can rely on their voters to believe them instead of questioning them?