The Coronavirus, not the beer

She is basically the same as Alex Jones.

Orange man has destroyed her

She is worse.

Go back and listen to alex Jones from many years back. Lots of what he said is coming true.

But somehow Maddow gets a primetime show and Alex Jones was blacklisted.

Maddow even admits she is purposefully lying on her show. It's crazy.
 
Alex Jones is an entertainer and said and still says a ridiculous amount of nonsense.

But, listen and you'll see that he knew what was happening.
 
[Tw]1244694824487464961[/tw]

There is still a lag on deaths but let's assume death count doubles
This would suggest approx a .34% death rate for an older more at risk population.
 
She is basically the same as Alex Jones.

Orange man has destroyed her

My initial thought was "oof" what a boner.

boner_2.gif


My second thought was "wait why are there no dates in this clip?" So I googled it and the president on Tuesday 3/17 promised the ship would be there "next week," which did not come true. This clip is from 3/20, Friday of that same week. It actually arrived "week after next" in that context, so technically not wrong. But she is clearly implying, if not explicitly stating, that they wouldn't be there for many weeks, which is a big ol' pot of wrong.

I have to rescind my initial full boner award, but I still things this deserves a half boner.

boner_6.gif


Mostly I'm mad on behalf of Alex Jones. The man has worked so hard to say literally the craziest things he can imagine, and y'all are just out here equating him with crappy media hottakes. Put some respect on his name.
 
You guys know that maddow has admitted, through her legal counsel, that she lies on purpose right?
 
[Tw]1244694824487464961[/tw]
There is still a lag on deaths but let's assume death count doubles
This would suggest approx a .34% death rate for an older more at risk population.

That range for Italy is insane (7x gap from low to high!!). Basically, we have have absolutely no clue how many people have this disease. Again, this is the problem that every single policy should be targeted towards solving (i.e., test, test, test, test, test, and test)
 
That range for Italy is insane (7x gap from low to high!!). Basically, we have have absolutely no clue how many people have this disease. Again, this is the problem that every single policy should be targeted towards solving (i.e., test, test, test, test, test, and test)

We dont have the antibody test though right?

I think just testing if someone is positive today is a small part of the story.
 
In my job if I went to an executive review with a proposal based on a range of 7x, I would get yelled out of the room. That’s the only part they would focus on.

How can you restart an economy and lax restrictions with that much uncertainty? Especially when that range represents 100,000’s of dead grandmas.
 
Back
Top