The Trump Presidency

Yeah the pandemic he failed to protect us from has drastically changed the status quo for the better. Really looking forward to how bad **** would be in another 4 years.
 
Are you advocating for disbanding police and other agencies of the govt that protect you?
 
sturg33 said:
Vaccines gonna be distributed next week.

A scientific miracle.

Thankfully they waited til after the election to make sure the orange man couldn't get any credit.
Click to expand...

Man and his cult that say a virus is fake and not harmful

Are upset that he won’t get credit for a miracle vaccine to fight non harmful virus

Amazing
 
sturg33 said:
Awww you want the government to protect you.

You're transformation into a sheep is complete.
Click to expand...

yes, I want the government to protect me and my family from deadly virus's from China or other nations. One of the few legitimate purposes of government is to protect us.All these measures you are so butt hurt about would have only been needed for a short term period if the President did his job and prevented the virus from getting here and spreading like wildfire. Targeted lockdowns might have been needed for 2-4 weeks. Instead our President spent vital time kissing a dictators ass and calling the threat from the virus a hoax. You can pretend like there was no way to stop this from getting out of China if you want but I dont buy it.
 
sturg33 said:
Where in the constitution does the federal government supposed to protect you.

Good little sheep you've become
Click to expand...

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

I would say looking out for people's safety and well-being falls under promote the general welfare. Just a thought.
 
nsacpi said:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

I would say looking out for people's safety and well-being falls under promote the general welfare. Just a thought.
Click to expand...

So why were you upset when Trump sent federal troops into Oregon?
 
sturg33 said:
So why were you upset when Trump sent federal troops into Oregon?
Click to expand...

We've discussed this. President Bush sent in troops to LA to calm things down after the Rodney King riots. He consulted with local leaders and civil rights leaders. He sought to bring people together. The approach of your boy was the opposite. He sought to pour gasoline on an already volatile situation, with language about dominating protesters.

Here's how a mature laider does it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynoZY1npoYA
 
sturg33 said:
Dude there were riots every single night and as you just posted the federal government must now protect us all.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry laidership and pouring gasoline on a volatile situation are two different things. I'm going to have to insist on the distinction.
 
Solid rebuttal again.

I can see how yall believe how you do when its framed as you expect the President to personally protect you.

Its very cute if it were a child but very pathetic for an adult
 
nsacpi said:
We've discussed this. President Bush sent in troops to LA to calm things down after the Rodney King riots. He consulted with local leaders and civil rights leaders. He sought to bring people together. The approach of your boy was the opposite. He sought to pour gasoline on an already volatile situation, with language about dominating protesters.

Here's how a mature laider does it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynoZY1npoYA
Click to expand...

Bush to Trump is hardly the only difference there, or even the biggest difference. The local leaders and civil rights leaders from this summer were an even bigger drop off from their predecessors than Trump was from Bush. Those leaders wanted the chaos to stop without anyone being hurt. The leaders from this summer had already baked violence and it's repercussions into the cost as a tool.

You know this stuff. Why are you reaching when there's plenty of legit stuff to criticize?
 
The Hoarse Whisperer
@TheRealHoarse
·
4h
Trump is going to try to take the Supreme Court to the Supreme Court, isn’t he?
 
Jaw said:
Bush to Trump is hardly the only difference there, or even the biggest difference. The local leaders and civil rights leaders from this summer were an even bigger drop off from their predecessors than Trump was from Bush. Those leaders wanted the chaos to stop without anyone being hurt. The leaders from this summer had already baked violence and it's repercussions into the cost as a tool.

You know this stuff. Why are you reaching when there's plenty of legit stuff to criticize?
Click to expand...

I'm not reaching. The head of the NAACP in Portland was quite outspoken about the fact that the antifans were jeopardizing all of the chances for constructive change coming out of the George Floyd protests. He called it a "white spectacle."

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/25/895423221/portland-naacp-president-on-protests-as-a-white-spectacle

I'm sure you're familiar with what Andrew Young had to say about the violence and destruction of property in Atlanta and elsewhere.

There were 2 things that were different from LA after the Rodney King riots. A group of opportunistic anarchists looking to stir things up and play the role of spoiler. And a president equally eager to play the role of spoiler. Both were bad faith actors with zero interest or ability to make a constructive contribution to the situation. very poorly chosen one and the antifans were locked in this symbiotic relationship that both found quite satisfying. The antifans are chuckleheads and I don't expect anything positive from them. I consider it a waste of time on my part to point out their bad faith. But I will use up time and bandwidth pointing out the bad faith of the guy occupying the Oval Office.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top