GovClintonTyree
<B>Vencer a Los Doyers</B>
This from guy who follow Rangers MiLB closely . . .
[TW]807018003309142016[/TW]
Has anyone ever quantified the number or percentage of pitchers who make it through "frustratingly persistent control issues?"
This from guy who follow Rangers MiLB closely . . .
[TW]807018003309142016[/TW]
People like Jenkins bc they wanted to believe it was worth it to trade Heyward. My goodness people hyped this kid up.
Not sure I like this deal but we have to get rid of players
Tyrell seemed like a good kid, but he wasn't going anywhere with us. I like the trend of stockpiling big arms for the pen. Some will pan out and some won't, but we'll have a power pen again soon if we play the odds. We'll aslo have some nice arms to throw in to future trades. Our surplus arms are looking promising
AAA
Simmons
Minter
Dirks
Morris
Jackson
Injured
Paco
Winkleer
Biddle
Walden
People like Jenkins bc they wanted to believe it was worth it to trade Heyward. My goodness people hyped this kid up.
Not sure I like this deal but we have to get rid of players
Don't forget Lindgren. He could easily be the best of the bunch. Rivero as well.
Now we think the Heyward trade was a bad deal?
Keith Law had Jenkins just outside his top 100 for a couple years. Lots of ppl liked Jenkins b/c of his stuff and his athletic ability. But for whatever reason his stuff never translated to Ks. Could get 2 strikes but not put anyone away.
When we made the Heyward trade we didn't know about the Shelby MIller trade. But we did really well on 1 year of Heyward.
Yes Lindgren for sure. In my mind he's a 2018 guy. Rivero will have to be on the major league team to stay, which I think he will do.
Now we think the Heyward trade was a bad deal?
Keith Law had Jenkins just outside his top 100 for a couple years. Lots of ppl liked Jenkins b/c of his stuff and his athletic ability. But for whatever reason his stuff never translated to Ks. Could get 2 strikes but not put anyone away.
When we made the Heyward trade we didn't know about the Shelby MIller trade. But we did really well on 1 year of Heyward.
better shot panning out then jenkins
I don't think so. Jenkins ceiling is much lower, but I think pretty attainable. Jackson has the higher chance of actually being an impact player though.
People like Jenkins bc they wanted to believe it was worth it to trade Heyward. My goodness people hyped this kid up.
Not sure I like this deal but we have to get rid of players
No, my point was (I thought it was mediocre at the time) that people hyped up Jenkins because there was dispute on if the Braves got enough. All of a sudden Jenkins was this unsung prospect.
I never heard him hyped that much. I thought the main response to his acquisition of "Who?" or "Another guy with arm problems."
Jenkins, like a lot of guys, needs an "out" pitch if he's going to succeed. I get the impression that he wasn't all the way back when the Braves pushed him aggressively in 2015. Hope he carves out a decent career.
I think most were generally optimistic about Jenkins due to the glowing reports he had out of the Arizona Fall League after we traded for him. He's really active on social media and engages his fans well (he's always crowd sourcing for fans to play him in Madden or FIFA).
I don't view him as necessarily a low ceiling player, but he'd obviously plateaued with the Braves. I wish him all the best with Rangers and I hope they "win" the trade for his sake. Great kid
to me Jenkins had a chance to be a solid reliever. I think the strike outs might have develop a little more as he adjusts to the pen and he might still have a long career. I could see this one backfiring a bit, but Braves are gambling right now with their upper level prospects. I think they've decided that they aren't intending to rely on many of them and are shooting for the stars.