Some Red State/Blue State Indicia

sturg33 said:
is that your way of saying "yes"?
Click to expand...

i'm trying to explain to you that by modern American standards San Francisco has very good health and in addition is a very wealthy place. Does it make it a modern American nirvana. No. But its pathologies and problems actually pale in comparison to ruby red America, where it is par for the course for many adults to be dentally impoverished.

So I'll get back to you with a yes or no answer when the problem of dental poverty in ruby red America is fixed. It shouldn't be too hard to fix since so many other places have figured that one out.
 
what is life expectancy in san francisco



The life expectancy in San Francisco is 82.9 years, which is higher than the national average of 78.6 years. This is due to a number of factors, including the city's high level of education, access to healthcare, and relatively low crime rate. However, there are also some disparities in life expectancy within the city, with African Americans and Pacific Islanders having a lower life expectancy than whites and Asians.

Here are some of the factors that contribute to San Francisco's high life expectancy:

High level of education: San Francisco has a highly educated population, with over 50% of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher. This level of education is associated with a number of health benefits, including lower rates of chronic diseases and obesity.
Access to healthcare: San Francisco has a number of high-quality hospitals and clinics, and the city's residents have access to a variety of health insurance plans. This access to healthcare helps to ensure that residents receive the care they need to stay healthy.
Low crime rate: San Francisco has a relatively low crime rate, which contributes to a sense of safety and security among residents. This sense of safety can help to reduce stress and improve overall health.
While San Francisco has a high life expectancy, there are some disparities in life expectancy within the city. African Americans and Pacific Islanders have a lower life expectancy than whites and Asians. This is due to a number of factors, including socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, and health behaviors.

There are a number of things that can be done to improve life expectancy in San Francisco, including:

Addressing socioeconomic disparities: San Francisco has a high level of income inequality, which can contribute to health disparities. Policies that address socioeconomic disparities, such as affordable housing and job training, can help to improve health outcomes for all residents.
Improving access to healthcare: San Francisco has a number of high-quality hospitals and clinics, but some residents may not have access to care due to cost or other barriers. Expanding access to healthcare can help to improve health outcomes for all residents.
Promoting healthy behaviors: San Francisco has a number of programs and initiatives that promote healthy behaviors, such as smoking cessation, physical activity, and healthy eating. These programs can help to improve health outcomes for all residents
 
propaganda from Bard

didn't expect such an involved answer to a simple factual question

but hey deep state runneth deep
 
are those 5 posts in response to the question whether you believe SF and others are currently healthy cities your way of saying "yes"?
 
sturg33 said:
are those 5 posts in response to the question whether you believe SF and others are currently healthy cities your way of saying "yes"?
Click to expand...

In terms of life expectancy SF is much healthier than ruby red America.

Same answer in terms of dental health (number of teeth per capita).

Doesn't mean poor people or people missing teeth are bad or unworthy people. They are just two metrics of health. By those metrics San Francisco is healthier, much healthier, than ruby red America. You may not LIKE those answers, but they ARE answers to your question.

The question I would ask is when will ruby red America figure out the answer to dental health. A lot of other places have, so it shouldn't be that hard.
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
In terms of life expectancy SF is much healthier than ruby red America.

Same answer in terms of dental health (number of teeth per capita).

Doesn't mean poor people or people missing teeth are bad or unworthy people. They are just two metrics of health. By those metrics San Francisco is healthier, much healthier, than ruby red America. You may not LIKE those answers, but they ARE answers to your question.

The question I would ask is when will ruby red America figure out the answer to dental health. A lot of other places have, so it shouldn't be that hard.
Click to expand...

Is that your way of saying "yes" to the question as to whether you believe SF is a healthy city or not?
 
Blue cities and states are cities and states in decline, and in decay. They are crime riddled, they are filthy. Businesses and people are leaving in droves.

I do not believe they are healthy cities

Please feel free to start naming some random rate states and tell the citizens who are miserable how wrong they are
 
Why would I want to pluck out random factoids when we have actual for real data on things like life expectancy and missing teeth per capita. Not to mention suicide rates and data on other deaths of despair (alcoholism and drug abuse).
 
Last edited:
Which states rank lowest on mental health.


According to the 2022 State of Mental Health in America report by Mental Health America, the following states ranked lowest on mental health:

Kansas
Oregon
Arizona
Alabama
Idaho
Texas
Wyoming
Nebraska
Arkansas
West Virginia
These states were ranked based on a number of factors, including the prevalence of mental illness, access to mental health care, and the quality of mental health care. The report found that these states have higher rates of mental illness, lower rates of access to mental health care, and lower quality of mental health care than other states.

There are a number of factors that contribute to the low mental health rankings of these states. Some of these factors include:

Lack of funding for mental health services
Stigma around mental illness
Lack of access to mental health providers
High cost of mental health care
These factors can make it difficult for people in these states to get the mental health care they need. As a result, they are more likely to experience mental health problems, such as depression, anxiety, and substance abuse.

It is important to note that these are just general trends. There are many people in these states who are mentally healthy, and there are many people in other states who are mentally unhealthy. The mental health of a state is influenced by a variety of factors, including the individual, the community, and the state.
 
It seems it should be quite easy for you to answer whether or not you think SF is a healthy city or not, rather than ask AI to skirt around it for you.

Are you 9 posts since the simple question your way of saying "yes"?
 
I dunno. I tried using metrics and data to answer. I guess that's not the sturg-approved method. I obviously have much to learn.
 
nsacpi said:
Which states rank lowest on mental health.


According to the 2022 State of Mental Health in America report by Mental Health America, the following states ranked lowest on mental health:

Kansas
Oregon
Arizona
Alabama
Idaho
Texas
Wyoming
Nebraska
Arkansas
West Virginia
These states were ranked based on a number of factors, including the prevalence of mental illness, access to mental health care, and the quality of mental health care. The report found that these states have higher rates of mental illness, lower rates of access to mental health care, and lower quality of mental health care than other states.

There are a number of factors that contribute to the low mental health rankings of these states. Some of these factors include:

Lack of funding for mental health services
Stigma around mental illness
Lack of access to mental health providers
High cost of mental health care
These factors can make it difficult for people in these states to get the mental health care they need. As a result, they are more likely to experience mental health problems, such as depression, anxiety, and substance abuse.

It is important to note that these are just general trends. There are many people in these states who are mentally healthy, and there are many people in other states who are mentally unhealthy. The mental health of a state is influenced by a variety of factors, including the individual, the community, and the state.
Click to expand...

This one reminded me about the pew study that showed that liberals get diagnosed with a mental illness at twice the rate of conservatives.

We all understand that leftists are insane. It don't matter which state they live in, though
 
nsacpi said:
I dunno. I tried using metrics and data to answer. I guess that's not the sturg-approved method. I obviously have much to learn.
Click to expand...

My question was to nsacpi as to whether or not nsacpi believes that some of these very blue cities are healthy?

Weirdly nsacpi won't answer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top