Bingo!
Enjoy Acuna while you can because he will get one of these mega contracts when he’s allowed to and the Braves are pretty much implying they can’t afford/(Won’t cut into there profits) a deal like that.
I heard Dave Scholfield? on ESPN ripping the Braves for not adding more this winter and while it’s debatable if they should have done more , I thought he made a good point in saying that since we now have the report out showing how much the Braves made the last fiscal year and how much they’ve spent this offseason, that he doesn’t believe they will be able to capitalize on having a great young core since our revenue went up and payroll is staying the same.I thought he made a good comparison saying we were very similar to Houston in market size and talent from a few years ago but he doesn’t think our owners will add the necessary pieces like they did.I hope he’s wrong and next offseason we add some money to the payroll but I’d say he’s pretty spot on...
True. My point is the Braves could obviously afford ONE $30M contract this year, if you're only talking about one year - they signed Donaldson and Neck ~$29M combined and they have at least
some cash left. So, 2019 wasn't the issue. You could have had Harper or Machado either one in 2019. The problem is that those guys don't get one year deals, they get 10 year deals.
The wisdom of signing either could be debated since the $30M deal for one player would make up ~ 25% of the total payroll (forgetting a moment that Donaldson's deal makes up about 20%). But still, the numbers work in 2019. The danger arises in 2020. 21, 22, ets and beyond where other players become more expensive but a theoretical Harper would still be taking up 25% of the payroll. Certainly a valid point, but
only if the payroll stays static or nearly so. If the payroll were to rise, say to $150M, in 2022 then Harpers theoretical contract would only be 20% of total payroll, no longer 25%. And say it goes to $180M in 2024, then it's 16.7% and so on. So the idea of having an aging vet taking up too much of your payroll is really only relevant if payroll is expected to remain relatively static
OR the contract is backloaded, growing at a rate equal or greater than overall payroll growth.
In other words, the moves made this year are only relevant to this year
IF payroll is really expected to grow in future years.