striker42
Well-known member
Just like Peraza was a year ago? If we move Simmons then that's yet another position that we have to hope gets filled by someone in the minors. If Simmons wasn't signed for those two extra years at such a team friendly deal then I would be more inclined to move him. But trading him now hurts the teams chances of trying to compete in 2017 if that is still the intended goal.
Which is why I probably wouldn't move Simmons unless I get guy back that I'm convinced is a cornerstone piece that will be key to competing in 2017. I'm not dealing Simmons for a low-A talent. But Albies gives us a little room at SS. It's a gamble as Albies could always flame out or get hurt but sometimes you gotta take risks. If we can turn Simmons into a cornerstone piece and have Albies manning short in another year, we'll be better off than trading Simmons later for a lesser return.