Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
Give the guy a break. He’s new to this whole “capitalism” thing.
... and going from $17/month to contemplating perhaps his only shot at a big payday.
Give the guy a break. He’s new to this whole “capitalism” thing.
I had no issues with Moncada because his youth fit with the 2017 timeline. This guy doesnt have that so hes not really a match and it makes little sense to spend on him at this time.
The Dodgers have made an offer to Cuban infielder Hector Olivera, a source tells Robert Murray of MLB Daily Rumors, and things are "heating up."
The Dodgers have always been viewed as contenders for the 29-year-old. It's unclear what the offer may be and how close it may be to the reported $50 million offer the Padres were considering for Olivera. The Braves are also heavily interested in the infielder, and a deal could be consummated someplace fairly soon.
Source: Robert Murray on Twitter
Latest on the Braves (per Bowman) is that their "comfort level" is between $30-$40M. So, do the math, I guess...
Latest on the Braves (per Bowman) is that their "comfort level" is between $30-$40M. So, do the math, I guess...
Sweet lord, we weren't even remotely serious.
MLBTR also notes that Joe Frisaro reports that the Marlins are comfortable making an offer around 50 million. Sounds like we won't even be able to outbid our division rival the Marlins.
Quite frankly, if the reported price is anywhere near $50MM, I really hope it isn't us. Way too much for a near 30 year old, unproven guy with all the reported health concerns. We have enough albatross contracts already.
Jesse Sanchez of MLB.com reports Cuban infielder Hector Olivera is weighing 4- to 6-year offers from several teams.
Sanchez lists the Dodgers, A's, Marlins, Padres, Braves and Giants as having shown "strong interest" in Olivera. A six-year offer would lock in Olivera until he's 36 years old, quite a commitment for a guy who hasn't had a single MLB at-bat. Of the interested parties, the Dodgers, Padres and Braves have been considered the frontrunners from the beginning. Sanchez said a deal could come this week.
Sweet lord, we weren't even remotely serious.
This is the type of leak that is definitely coming form Olivera's agency based on the info provided and the fact that it's coming from Jesse Sanchez. I don't see any team guaranteeing him 6 years. I'm guessing he'll get 3 years guaranteed with a 4th year option. $25m to $30m guaranteed with heavy incentives based on PA on top of that. If it's going to take significantly more than that, we should wish him well and move on.
It's definitely a risk, but might be a pretty good one, and could end up being efficient. LT deals these days are easily 8-10 years, some paying guys into their late-30s. If we could get a guy at 30 and only have him until ages 34 or 35, it would be a huge plus. Difference is he's never played a game in the majors. A lot of people are very convinced he's a legit MLB hitter.
Rumors are our offer included a rather large signing bonus. Take that for what its worth, but that's potentialy 40+ million offer for a 29 year old who has yet to play a major league game. That seems like a pretty serious offer to me.
If he takes a 6 year deal from the Dodgers, then I'll be more than happy we didn't get him.
Name a good one signed in the last 5 years that worked out well for both the team and the player. Bet you can't. Those deals are quickly disappearing across the game everywhere other than New York.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with passing here, and what's "efficient" about signing a player with health (and age) concerns to...
A.) Get in the way of Peterson/Peraza/Albies at 2B when you've already got Callaspo, EY Jr., or KJ under contract for much less money?
B.) Get in the way of Peterson/Ruiz at 3B when you've already got Johnson under contract for less money?
C.) Play the only position the organization is likely considering spending big money on a free-agent to play next winter when you've got 5 options to play there already?
Olivera would potentially be a tradeable asset if signed for 3/$24 million - 4/$32 million IF he comes in and hits .285/.360/.450 with 15+ bombs in 2015. Spending more money than that on him just isn't a good idea at this point - you could very easily wind up with a backup you're paying $10 million a year for if Peterson/Peraza/Albies/Ruiz develop as expected. There's nothing "efficient" about that whatsoever.
Your willingness to sign a long-term deal when you KNOW you're going to wind up eating an unproductive season (or maybe even two) makes a modicum of sense when you're talking about a franchise player - someone that makes a HUGE difference in the way other teams have to approach you. Going 8 years to get J-Up or Cespedes to hit behind Freeman for a long time may be a necessary evil, but it's far from "efficient". You do it because it often pays for itself in other areas as well.
Olivera's far from that type of player.