Legal/scotus thread
- Thread starter cajunrevenge
- Start date
Chipper
Spring Training Invitee
I know you guys don't care about my opinion but here it is.
He was never not going to be nominated because Republicans will vote their party no matter what. If they had video of him raping someone it wouldn't matter. They don't care, they've shown it over and over. In fact, they love him even more because the Democrats hate him so much.
If he was removed from consideration, Trump wasn't going to pick someone else that the Democrats would want, most likely worse that him.
The only hope the Democrats have of blocking anything by Trump is to take control in November. Anything else is just pissing into the wind.
He was never not going to be nominated because Republicans will vote their party no matter what. If they had video of him raping someone it wouldn't matter. They don't care, they've shown it over and over. In fact, they love him even more because the Democrats hate him so much.
If he was removed from consideration, Trump wasn't going to pick someone else that the Democrats would want, most likely worse that him.
The only hope the Democrats have of blocking anything by Trump is to take control in November. Anything else is just pissing into the wind.
57Brave
Well-known member
Rantt Media
@RanttMedia
3m3 minutes ago
When Franken was accused—he resigned
When Schneiderman was accused—he resigned
When Conyers was accused—he resigned
When Trump was accused—he was elected
When Moore was accused—he was endorsed
When Kavanaugh was accused—he was confirmed
Never say the parties are the same
@RanttMedia
3m3 minutes ago
When Franken was accused—he resigned
When Schneiderman was accused—he resigned
When Conyers was accused—he resigned
When Trump was accused—he was elected
When Moore was accused—he was endorsed
When Kavanaugh was accused—he was confirmed
Never say the parties are the same
57Brave
Well-known member
yep those are the " nuts " people
In his Senate testimony last week, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly lied under oath to defend himself against a credible allegation of sexual assault. He lied about the extent of his drinking. He lied about “boofing” and threesomes. He lied about using his high school yearbook profile to sexually humiliate another classmate.
57Brave
Well-known member
Democrats would do the same exact thing.
Bill Clinton? He denied it. Which was a lie and stayed in office
Cory Booker? Has he resigned? Nope
Ted Kennedy murdered someone. Did he resign?
57Brave
Well-known member
But the skeleton in Booker’s closet seized on by outlets such as Fox News and the Daily Caller wasn’t really in his closet. The senator himself chose years ago to air the issue, marking a notable contrast with instances in which accusations of impropriety burst forth as a result of media investigation or opposition research.
In 1992, Booker, then a student at Stanford University, wrote a column for his college newspaper in which he recounted the groping and used his own behavior to underscore, in starkly personal terms, how his views had shifted on gender and sexual respect. He credited his work as a peer counselor with the transformation.
Perhaps next time do better homework and
You forgot to mention Robert Byrd was once a Klansman
striker42
Well-known member
yep those are the " nuts " people
In his Senate testimony last week, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly lied under oath to defend himself against a credible allegation of sexual assault. He lied about the extent of his drinking. He lied about “boofing” and threesomes. He lied about using his high school yearbook profile to sexually humiliate another classmate.
And all this stuff justifies histrionics in the Senate gallery? The behavior was silly and makes whatever viewpoint they're advocating look bad.
So you have no problems with murderers or rapists if it happened decades ago?
50PoundHead
Hessmania Forever
I think we should order everyone on the board one of these. I'm a 7 1/2.
Oklahomahawk
Boras' Client
And you would (rightly) condemn it.
Oklahomahawk
Boras' Client
I think we should order everyone on the board one of these. I'm a 7 1/2.
I just want all the chocolate that was hopefully in there to start with.
57Brave
Well-known member
your 2 examples besides Booker
1) stood an impeachment that didnt fly.Due process -day in court if you will.
Countering BK's stance of POTUS being susceptible to charge
I don't know about the other allegations. They have been out there for over 30 years now and except on Fox or Daily Caller are considered unsubstantiated
Until Trump I feel safe assuming the Clintons (Bill and HRC) were the most investigated people in history of US.
If there was a there there I feel certain we would have seen it by now
2) the other that happened 50 years ago has been dead for 8 or 9 years
Are you advocating trying Kennedy in absentia due to demise ?
57Brave
Well-known member
Of course it does . You are a lawyer refer to the right to assemble.
It is apparently effective because you keep talking about it
No matter what (D) does besides lay down looks silly to you.
Hardly an impartial observer
..........
You never said whether you had sons or daughters
VirginiaBrave
Well-known member
But Monica was consensual though that's the difference. Anything else other than Monica is well small taters because he wasn't Pres. at the time.
Hope you’re trolling. Clinton is a despicable serial woman abuser who should be behind bars. Guess the #metoo movement doesn’t include him
Oklahomahawk
Boras' Client
Not trying to pick on you k, I promise, it just seems like you always post the last post in a group that I wanted to respond to.
Maybe you guys can help out the old guy with the failing memory. Didn't the Repubs completely believe 100% of the women who accused Bill Clinton? Don't they still? Now today we all know what Bill is/was but back then very few knew for sure, only the ones who accused him. So, what was the difference other than party affiliation? Oh and please none of you respond with "he was guilty of doing all of them". Again none of the Repubs accusing him back then knew the truth, they only knew what they wanted to believe, just like the Dems also did then, just like both Repubs and Dems are doing now.
So, who can help me out here?
