As much as it hurts to admit, I call Folty a bust.
He's an average pitcher. I don't see how that's a miss. May be he won't ever take that next step into No. 2-3 role (or better). I don't think that makes him a bust.
As much as it hurts to admit, I call Folty a bust.
I agree with people I agree with.
The Braves are 1 for 11 with recently promoted SP prospects. Is that a good outcome in your opinion?
I see Soroka, Wright, and Allard sticking as starters along with Gohara. Even if Folty, Newk, and Touki don't pan out as starters we are in an awesome position bc those 3 would be lights out closers/back end of bullpen guys. So they will still be huge pieces of this team regardless if it's starting or being a lights out pen guy.
Gohara, Soroka, Wright and Allard are all Top 50 type prospects. What's not well understood around here is the high bust rate for pitching prospects that are as highly rated as they are. A good summary can be found in this article.
http://www.thepointofpittsburgh.com/mlb-prospect-surplus-values-2016-updated-edition/
For pitching prospects ranked 25-50, about 40% end up generating surplus value of 3 WAR or less. In all likelihood 2 out of Gohara, Wright, Soroka and Allard will end up washing out. They may end up having 2 or 3 years as mid level starters but that's it. The other 2 will do better. Those are the actuarial odds. We may do better, but for planning purposes that the assumption a front office should make.
I get this argument... but I also think there is a bit of hyperbole in it as well. Good pitchers come from somewhere. So if 50% of the best prospects fail, then there must be a pretty fair number of guys who were not expected to do much that end up better than projected.
So yeah. Some of these guys will make it and some won't, but some guys who we didn't project will surprise us and be good. The reason the price of pitching is so high is that once it becomes "proven" the element of chance in their development has been significantly reduced. It is pretty much injury based at that point.
We can let other teams figure out who the good pitchers are then acquire them (higher price) or try to develop a whole bunch, knowing that some will make it and most won't. Over time, either could work, or fail. I don't think it is as cut and dried as we sometimes try to make it here, and I don't think we should say "Well, the top pitching prospects failed at XX rate, so the rebuild is a bust."
You try a lot of different strategies, and some of them will work and other won't. Contrary to board opinion. How it turns out (the result) does matter.
Here's how it breaks down. If you looked at the top 20 starters in 2017, you would find 2 or 3 who were not highly regarded prospects. The rest were all on various Top 100 lists coming up. But you have to understand the odds. Over a 10 year period, you will have around 150 different pitching prospects make BA's Top 50 list. From those 150 only 15 or so are currently aces (among the top 20 starters in baseball). It is simply a matter of numbers. The pyramid is very steep and littered with more failures than successes even among very good prospects.
As for the remain 2 or 3 who were not highly touted prospects, that turns out to 1 our of 10 major league teams hitting on that particular lottery. Maybe we will be a lucky team.
I might add the odds are quite a bit better for highly ranked pitching prospect to be league average for a few years before getting hurt or washing out. Those guys are not exactly busts. But they are not stars either. I think we should consider ourselves lucky is 2 of the guys currently in the system end up being among the best pitchers in the game. 2 our of say Gohara, Soroka, Allard and Wright.
Yup. I understand that. I also believe that we don't need them all to be among the best pitchers in the game. You get one or maybe two "best in the game" (depending on how you define that), and a couple more good solid pitchers. You keep a pipeline coming to fill out the rotation from year to year.
According to Shanks most recent article Coppy was offered a severance package, which he refused, and has lawyered up.
Also read where “many eyebrows were raised” when Hart and McGuirk played golf with Manfred a few days before Coppy resigned.
According to Shanks most recent article Coppy was offered a severance package, which he refused, and has lawyered up.
Also read where “many eyebrows were raised” when Hart and McGuirk played golf with Manfred a few days before Coppy resigned.
He's an average pitcher. I don't see how that's a miss. May be he won't ever take that next step into No. 2-3 role (or better). I don't think that makes him a bust.
No way JS should maintain his position after all this nonsense. Daily active role or not you have partial responsibility for what has taken place. Clean house and maybe the MLB will be more lenient on their penalties.
I totally agree..Nobody in the position to fire JS cares enough to do that.
He's an average pitcher. I don't see how that's a miss. May be he won't ever take that next step into No. 2-3 role (or better). I don't think that makes him a bust.
I agree that we need Folty to take that next step and Gohara (or someone else), along with a return to normal for JT if we have any hope of making the playoffs in 2018.
I was just making the point that Folty need not progress much more to be considered a success. May be he's lucky enough to stay healthy and become another Ryan Dempster. Nothing wrong with that at all, though obviously we hope for more of a Dan Haren career path.