Neverending **** the Police thread.

Good new for once everyone. The cold blooded murder and unashamed racist Amber Guyger has been denied parole after 5 years. She should be on death row but any day she isnt roaming the streets for her next victim is a good day. And if you dont think she is an unashamed racist she said in her social media posts before the shooting that she didnt even trust black cops simply because of their skin color.
 
[video=youtube_share;vwzixtoe57w]https://youtu.be/vwzixtoe57w?si=QyXuz7Fs5imEN2Jn[/video]

Interviews after the murder of Elijiah McClain show how corrupt the system is. The investigator literally coaches the suspects to get the answers he wants to use to justify their actions. This is like a defense lawyer doing your police interview. And they would have gotten away with this because no charges were even considered before it went public. The "investigator" coaches all of them to say they were in fear for their life..... from the man they were attacking....... might attack them if they stop attacking him...... just assbackwards logic. Put yourself in this young mans place. Your a young black man listening to music on your headphones walking home from the gas station near your home. Cops pull up real fast jump out , charge you, and tackle, and start beating you in the span of 10 seconds. I am pretty damn sure that young man feared for his life too. Keep in mind he had not committed any crime so its not like he robbed a bank and should be expecting cops to arrest him. Keep in mind the 911 caller never said he committed any crime. And cops attacked him because he didnt react fast enough because he was wearing headphones within 5 seconds of getting out of the car despite him doing nothing but continuing to walk slowly. He didnt try to run. He didnt try to fight the cop.
 
[video=youtube_share;79VdFldr-c0]https://youtu.be/79VdFldr-c0?si=3-eh5fbHhWs6C7-1[/video]

Trump says he is going to end weaponization of the law against the American people but he also says he wants to make cops above the law. If he wanted to end **** like this I would be all for it. City Councils cant make rules saying you cant criticize them in a public meeting. Its the most literal violation of the first amendment rights. Yet the police here illegally arrest this woman. The Judge dismissed the charges with prejudice and called it outrageous conduct by the city. So heres a leaked video of the Chief telling his officers he dont give a **** what the court says, keep arresting people who are clearly doing constitutionally protected activity. This in my opinion is a situation where if 100 armed people showed up and defended her from the cops at the next city meeting I think thats an appropriate use of the second amendment.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...rmed-suspect-cuffed-in-patrol-car/ar-BB1ih7ME

I had heard that the cop who tried to murder a handcuffed suspect in the back of his patrol car was charged but when I looked it up I saw that the police declared his attempted murder "objectively reasonable". Thats right, its objectively reasonable to mistake an acorn hitting his vehicle as gunshots and to THEN shoot at the suspect in the patrol car WITH HANDS CUFFED BEHIND HIS BACK who apparently this cop shot him without even breaking a window in the vehicle. That is literally the exact opposite of objectively reasonable.
 
[video=youtube;jtRU3vZI-QU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtRU3vZI-QU[/video]

Some ground breaking **** here. Cops beat up and arrested a man trying to save his house from a small fire. They bring in a special grand jury who flips the script and indict the cop instead. I believe a normal grand jury only has the right to indict the accused but a special grand jury is not limited in who they can indict. I have never seen this happen.
 
[video=youtube;NTw0kQX2Sck]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTw0kQX2Sck[/video]

Good news for corrupt cops. A Judge has ruled that falsifying a search warrant that leads to the murder of an innocent person is only a misdemeanor. They really about give these cops a 500 dollar fine for murder.
 
[video=youtube_share;V-STkBLvo8I]https://youtu.be/V-STkBLvo8I?si=SpUV5uIzcTSNJYdH[/video]

16 year old kid goes to the train station. Another kid there pulls out a gun and starts shooting at him. He runs away. Cops responding to the scene sees him fleeing and shoots him without ever even saying a word. Then they planted a gun on him to try to justify their actions. They will investigate themselves and find the did nothing wrong but if you put this before a grand jury with a honest process not the DA going into a grand jury acting as the cops lawyer I think the cop would be indicted easily.
 
[tw]1901259198853251532[/tw]

Look, swatting someone is immoral and should be punished. But as a reminder, if the police actually harm you as a result of a hoax phone call, perhaps we should take a look at our policing practices.
 
Swatting needs to be treated as attempted murder But also we need some protections for the victims. For starters police need to practice some common sense. People dont call 911 to announce they killed their family all calm and not panicking. Probably 1 or less per year in the whole country. They need to approach these situations knowing its more than a 99% chance its a hoax. There needs to be rules about aborting the investigating of the victim as soon as they realize whats going on. Too often I see cops blame the victim and even keep searching looking for a reason to arrest them. For example bringing a drug sniffing dog in. You dont need a drug sniffing dog to respond to a murder. And you surely cant bring it in AFTER learning it was a hoax. Cops also need to uncuff the victims ASAP. They generally leave them handcuffed while explaining what happened.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Swatting needs to be treated as attempted murder But also we need some protections for the victims. For starters police need to practice some common sense. People dont call 911 to announce they killed their family all calm and not panicking. Probably 1 or less per year in the whole country. They need to approach these situations knowing its more than a 99% chance its a hoax. There needs to be rules about aborting the investigating of the victim as soon as they realize whats going on. Too often I see cops blame the victim and even keep searching looking for a reason to arrest them. For example bringing a drug sniffing dog in. You dont need a drug sniffing dog to respond to a murder. And you surely cant bring it in AFTER learning it was a hoax. Cops also need to uncuff the victims ASAP. They generally leave them handcuffed while explaining what happened.
Click to expand...

People actually have done that. I am not going to say that it is common (of course murder isn't common anyways), but there are plenty of documented cases of psychotic episodes where the murderer shows no emotion and acts as if what happened was a regular Tuesday. You certainly can't afford to treat a situation like this as a hoax.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top