The Coronavirus, not the beer

Also, I love how the NYC tests need to be studied for bias, but Chicago and Cali tests were totally accurate and representative of half the population having the 'Rona.
 
thethe's record in this thread (so far):

It's been here spreading since October. X

The death rate is likely .1 (or lower) X

We won't even see 50k deaths X

At least half of NYC is already infected X
 
I remember when thethe said we wouldn't see 20k deaths and that 15k deaths was already the peak.

Well my original was 100-200k when that seemed insane.

Then I went to 50K. 12k was more of a mocking of the confidence levels we should have in the IHME model.

Looks like we will be over 50K because we didn't use science and data to fight the virus. Just fear.
 
thethe's record in this thread (so far):

It's been here spreading since October. X

The death rate is likely .1 (or lower) X

We won't even see 50k deaths X

At least half of NYC is already infected X

Great - No plan.

Lets just stay inside!!!
 
[Tw]1253366758217601025[/tw]

The idea the lockdown was to prevent death is revisionist history.

People die. It's part of life.

People need to grow up.
 
[Tw]1253366758217601025[/tw]

The idea the lockdown was to prevent death is revisionist history.

People die. It's part of life.

People need to grow up.

No this is revisionist theory. US experts have maintained since mid-march that the death rate was likely about 1%. Do we really have to back and dig up these posts? Fauci claiming it's 10 times worse than the Flu? .8% is pretty effing close to 1%, and it continues to grow.
 
GA about to open up, and kill a lot of people.

I wish you all the best of luck surviving the idiots you are surrounded by. Some of you don't deserve the crap that swirls around you in the anti-intellectual South. Some of you do.
 
Last edited:
[Tw]1253307521017671686[/tw]

You guys parroted the study as if it meant a thing.

Disgusting you guys are emotionally invested in a treatment not working because orange man bad.

Take a ****ing minute to self reflect.

Dear God

It's clear you didn't read any of the studies in question, but are just ****posting other people's ****posts because they are saying things that make you feel good. So I would hope you would take your own advice to heart.

You need to keep your blood pressure down in these trying time. Big risk factor. Don't want to be put in the sacrificial lamb pile.
 
No this is revisionist theory. US experts have maintained since mid-march that the death rate was likely about 1%. Do we really have to back and dig up these posts? Fauci claiming it's 10 times worse than the Flu? .8% is pretty effing close to 1%, and it continues to grow.
Yup. Fauci said 10 times as deadly as the flu.
 
thethe's record in this thread (so far):

It's been here spreading since October. X

The death rate is likely .1 (or lower) X

We won't even see 50k deaths X

At least half of NYC is already infected X

How could this be?

I have never, EVER, seen tehteh be wrong about anything....ever. Not once.

Oh wait, that fool is literally wrong about everything he ever talks about...so this all tracks perfectly with past precedent.
 
It's clear you didn't read any of the studies in question, but are just ****posting other people's ****posts because they are saying things that make you feel good. So I would hope you would take your own advice to heart.

You need to keep your blood pressure down in these trying time. Big risk factor. Don't want to be put in the sacrificial lamb pile.

I 100% read the study.
 
[Tw]1253366758217601025[/tw]

The idea the lockdown was to prevent death is revisionist history.

People die. It's part of life.

People need to grow up.

The 95% CI IFR in the Imperial College report was 0.4 - 1.4 (0.9 mid point), if I remember correctly. Seems like that was pretty spot on for NYC at least.

That report was clear XX many deaths, if we do nothing. XX deaths if we do this. XX fewer deaths if we do this. That was supposedly the model that woke people up. Not much revision needed.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top