Trump Indictment Watch

thethe said:
[tw]1723457323878760792[/tw]

Of course the prosecution will reject this.

American people deserve to see every second of this sham.
Click to expand...



Considering he treats the trials as political rallies rather than trials it's understandable they don't want to give him free campaign ads.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Considering he treats the trials as political rallies rather than trials it's understandable they don't want to give him free campaign ads.
Click to expand...

Of course you don’t want the cameras in there. All of these hoaxes are shown for what they are when you shine some light.
 
[tw]1723710920692474240[/tw]

I’ve said this from the beginning.

Nothing was ever truly adjudicated and the few times a court ruled on the facts of the case trump and his lawyers won the majority of the time.

It was always about kicking the can down the road hoping trumps support would dwindle. One leg in the plan was the faux RDS campaign.

The world will know the truth. The wheels of justice grind slowly…..
 
thethe said:
Of course you don’t want the cameras in there. All of these hoaxes are shown for what they are when you shine some light.
Click to expand...


I want the trial televised..... the Georgia trial will be televised. He cant win based on the facts so he has to win based on propaganda.
 
thethe said:
[tw]1723710920692474240[/tw]

I’ve said this from the beginning.

Nothing was ever truly adjudicated and the few times a court ruled on the facts of the case trump and his lawyers won the majority of the time.

It was always about kicking the can down the road hoping trumps support would dwindle. One leg in the plan was the faux RDS campaign.

The world will know the truth. The wheels of justice grind slowly…..
Click to expand...



This isnt even a valid defense. What you are arguing amounts to "Yeah I tried to rob the bank but they owed me a 1.50$ which justifies my actions"
 
cajunrevenge said:
I want the trial televised..... the Georgia trial will be televised. He cant win based on the facts so he has to win based on propaganda.
Click to expand...

The facts in GA will be so overwhelming it’ll be the tipping point forever for people to realize 2020 was stolen.
 
thethe said:
No it’s more like I’m here to report a bank robbery and you get jailed for it.
Click to expand...


So you think Biden can unilaterally decide that the 2024 election was stolen from him and any blue state Trump wins can overturn the results to give Biden the win just because Biden says so? There are legitimate means if you think the election was stolen. Trump exhausted those. Then tried illegal means. You dont even realize that "actually the election was stolen" wont even be allowed to argue in these cases.
 
cajunrevenge said:
So you think Biden can unilaterally decide that the 2024 election was stolen from him and any blue state Trump wins can overturn the results to give Biden the win just because Biden says so? There are legitimate means if you think the election was stolen. Trump exhausted those. Then tried illegal means. You dont even realize that "actually the election was stolen" wont even be allowed to argue in these cases.
Click to expand...

Who ever said we wanted trump to unilaterally says this? Find those posts.

Majority of cases were not based on facts and you know that.
 
Are you kidding me? You lost the court cases. You didnt have the votes in Congress to change the result. You loss sir. Game over. There are no other legal means to change certified results.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Are you kidding me? You lost the court cases. You didnt have the votes in Congress to change the result. You loss sir. Game over. There are no other legal means to change certified results.
Click to expand...

Facts were never adjudicated in majority of cases and you know it.

Who says the votes didn’t exist? Especially they didn’t exist after true existence testing was performed and it was proven the election was stolen?
 
They were never adjudicated because they didnt provide any evidence of anything to adjudicate. It was "well if you grant us discovery we think we might find something". You not liking the results of the court cases does not make other means legal. If there was/is merit to your claims you dont have to use intimidation and extortion to get your own supporters to believe them.
 
cajunrevenge said:
They were never adjudicated because they didnt provide any evidence of anything to adjudicate.
Click to expand...

The corollary is that lawyers know there are serious consequences for making false statements in a legal filing. So the unsubstantiated claims and rumors never make it into a courthouse.
 
nsacpi said:
The corollary is that lawyers know there are serious consequences for making false statements in a legal filing. So the unsubstantiated claims and rumors never make it into a courthouse.
Click to expand...

A for the use of the word corollary

F for the logical argument
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top